My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0425_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0425_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2011 12:36:31 PM
Creation date
12/21/2011 11:51:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 methodology developed by the Council, but also factored in the priorities identified in the recent <br />35 community survey, as well as Staffs own experiences as to which programs create the greatest value for <br />36 ff the greatest number of citizens. In this second iteration, Sta was also asked to rank all city programs in an <br />37 effort to produce a composite score that would minimize any inherent bias that might be present on an <br />3, individual level. <br />39 <br />4o The composite program rankings as compiled by City Staff are included in Attachment A. <br />41 POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />42 Not applicable. <br />43 FINANCIAL IMPACTS <br />44 Not applicable. <br />45 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />46 Not applicable. <br />47 REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br />48 For information purposes only. No formal Council action is requested. <br />49 <br />Prepared by: Chris Miller., Finance Director <br />Attachments: A: Budget Program Staff Rankings <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.