2011_0711_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Rf- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION BACKGROUND 2 • The subject property is a single-family detached home. 3 0 The current owner is Mr. Robert Ethan. 4 0 The home was in foreclosure,, its status now is unknown. f'_11'1;� • At the February , 2011 Public Hearing, Council delayed action on this abatement request for "7 120 days (until June 14) in order to allow the property owner more time to correct the 11 violations. A reins anion on June 17, 2011, revealed that corrections have not been completed. 9 Current violations include.- '10 0 Numerous house maintenance issues,, outside storage of junk, debris, and brush, and an unlicensed vehicle in the driveway (violation of City Code Sections .02.J & K, I 12 407.02.1)., .03.H,, and 407.02.0). 13 0 A status update, including pictures, will be provided at the public hearing. '14 POLICY OBJECTIVE 27 Property maintenance through City abatement activities is a key tool to preserving high-quality residential neighborhoods. Both Imagine Roseville 2025 and the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan support property maintenance as a means by which to achieve neighborhood stability. The Housing section of Imagine Roseville suggests that the City "implement programs to ensure safe and well- maintained properties." In addition, the Land Use chapter (Chapter 3), and the Housing and Neighborhoods chapter (Chapter 6), of the Comprehensive Plan support the City's efforts to maintain livability of the City's residential neighborhoods with sp'ec ific 'Policies related to property maintenance and code compliance. Policy 6.1 of Chapter 3 states that the City should promote maintenance and reinvestment in housing and Policy 2.6 of Chapter 6 guides the City to use code-compliance activities as one method to prevent neighborhood decline. FINANCIAL IMPACTS City Abatement., An abatement would encompass the following: zm�