1983_0509_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

of Pxknok, prejo &N 4 May 1983 CASE NUMBERM 1431-83 APPLICANT: Roberts Construction, Inc A LOCATION,*M, South, of County Road C, between Cleveland and Fa,irview Avenues W ACTION REQUE'STE'D Variance to Yard Setbacks Variance to Flolor Area Ratio A gar PLAMING CONSIDERATIONS16 1. In Sepitembler 19,81 I, this property was approved for.. a subdivision, a variance to front and sidle yard setbacks, and a, variance to the floor area ratio for Donald Rue who is the owner of the land contiguous to the west. At that time., these approvals were approved in conjunction with a proposed structure .which, is indicated on the attached site plan. 1101 Since that time,, Roberts Construction has purchased the land and proposes to, build, a very similar build ing. 'The ' variances requested on the new building are less than that previously approved, and thus a building permit could, normally, bile 'Issued without reprocessing the application to the Planmi.ng, Commission and Council. 3. However, inasmuch as the variances' were approved in September 1981, the 6 W time 1limit, has expired and therefore a new application is being reviewed at this tiine, a 4. The previous applicati"Loin was approved for a 20 foot setback from the front lot line whereas 40 foot is required, (for parking that is located between the build iings and thel, front lot 1 ine) The current application 'is for 36 feet. ThiLs setback has been increased because of the requirement for a poinding area, 'in this Portion ,of the land as required by the Rice Creek Watershed D311-str 12ct 0 5. The application for a 1,0 foot side yard, variance was approved which 18s the same variance being requested at this tii'mew 61, 'The f1loor area ratio (the amount of land that can be covered with a onz story building) in I Industrial, District is The variance requested is 0.39, wherea,si the previous, variance was for 0.4. I Reduced copies of the s311-te, plan were not delivered in time for this mailincr 0 but will be available for, your review at the Planning Commission and Council hearings.