My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0613_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0613_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:43 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 8:43:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
landscaping in such a narrow place, but a 6-foot porch would still accommodate a couple <br />of chairs while still leaving enough space for turf, flowers, shrubs, topiaries, and so on. <br />3.0 EMPLOYMENT DISTRICTS PARKING SETBACK AMENDMENT <br />Previous versions of industrial and commercial zoning districts required narrower <br />minimum side and rear parking setbacks where such properties were surrounded by other <br />like properties, and allowed parking areas to extend to and across side and rear property <br />lines where adjacent business properties wanted to share parking areas, aisles, or access <br />drives. But the present Office/Business Park (O/BP) and Industrial (1) districts fail to <br />provide this flexibility. The proposed amendments, shown in Attachment A, reduce the <br />minimum setbacks and allow for continuous,, shared parking facilities in O/BP and I <br />districts to be more consistent with previous requirements. <br />4.0 PUBLIC COMMENT <br />4.1 The duly-noticed public hearing for the proposed TEXT AMENDMENTS was held by the <br />Planning Commission on June 1, 2011 - draft minutes were not available at the time this <br />report was prepared. Planning Commissioners had only a couple clarifying questions. No <br />members of the public were present to comment on the proposal and, after closing the <br />public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (i.e., 6-0) to recommend <br />approval of the proposed amendments. <br />4.2 As of the time this report was prepared, Planning Division staff has received no <br />communications ftom the public on the proposed TEXT AMENDMENTS. <br />5.0 RECOMMENDATION <br />Planning Division staff concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to <br />approve the proposed zoning code TEXT AMENDMENTS. <br />6.0 SUGGESTED ACTION <br />6.1 Based on the comments in Sections 2-4 of this report, adopt an ordinance amending <br />Chapters 1004 and 1006 of the City Code. <br />6.2 Approve an ordinance summary for publication in the Roseville Review. <br />Prepared b y: Associate Planner Bryan Llo d (651-792-7073) <br />Attachments: A. Draft ordinance B. Draft ordinance summary <br />Amdt3—RCA-061311 (3).doc <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.