My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0613_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0613_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:43 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 8:43:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 4.0 BACKGROUND <br />22 4. 1 The former Stuart Anderson's Cattle Company site at 2750 Snelling Avenue (currently <br />23 undeveloped) has both a Comprehensive Plan designation and Zoning classification of <br />24 Community Business (CB), in which a drive-through requires approval as a CONDITIONAL <br />25 USE. <br />26 4.2 The new office/financial building would be constructed to meet all requirements of the <br />27 new Zoning Ordinance, which requires buildings to be placed forward and parking to the <br />28 side and/or rear. As suck, the site obtains its access from the shared with former <br />29 Fuddruckers) drive lane to/from the Snelling Avenue frontage road. Parking is proposed <br />30 in the rear of the site and the drive-through has been placed along the north side of the <br />31 building, which includes four lanes, three for business and one as an ATM. Although the <br />32 building can be constructed as a permitted use, the drive-through, a vital accessory use of <br />33 a bank or financial institution,, requires an approved CONDITIONAL E. <br />34 5.0 CONDITIONAL USE ANALYSIS <br />35 5.1 REVIEW OF GENERAL CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA.- Section 1009.02C of the City Code <br />36 establishes general standards and criteria for all conditional uses, and the Planning <br />37 Commission and City Council must find that each proposed conditional use does or can <br />38 meet these requirements. The general standards are as follows.- <br />39 a. The proposed use is not in con Tic t with the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Division <br />4O has reviewed the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and determined that that the proposed <br />41 drive-through and office use are not in conflict with the Plan. Specifically the <br />4 Planning Division believes that the proposed office building with a drive-through <br />43 advances land use goals and policies within Sections 1, 2, 9 10 and 11, including the <br />44 following.- <br />45 1. Policy 1..: Promote well- planned and coordinated development. <br />4 . Policy 1.6: Encourage! improvements, to the connectivity and wall ability <br />47 between and within the community's, neighborhoods,, gathering places, and <br />48 commercial areas, through new development, redevelopment, and <br />4 infrastructure! projects,. <br />50 3. Policy 2.3 : Encourage! a broad mix of commercial businesses, within the <br />51 community to diversify and strengthen the tax base and employment <br />52 opportunities,. <br />53 4. Policy .1: Encourage commercial areas, to make efficient use of land, <br />54 provide for safe vehicular and pedestrian movements,, provide! adequate! <br />55 parking areas,, provide appropriate site landscaping, and create quality and <br />56 enduring aesthetic character. <br />57 5. Policy 9.2: Promote commercial development that is accessible by transit, <br />58 automobile!, walking, and bicycle!. <br />59 6. Policy 11.3: Encourage! the development of multistory office and light- <br />60 industrial uses, to use land efficiently, expand the property tax base!, and <br />61 create! jobs. <br />PFI I -O I 5RCA061311 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.