My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0718_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0718_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:44 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 9:28:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville,, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the th day of July, 2011, <br />at 6.-00 p.m. <br />The following members were present <br />and the following were absent <br />Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption.- <br />RESOLUTION No. <br />Opposition to Ramsey County Half-�Cent Sales Tax for Viking Stadium <br />WHEREAS,, the Roseville City Council recognizes the social and economic value of the <br />Minnesota Vikings Football team to the State of Minnesota- and, <br />WHEREAS,, to preserve the Minnesota Vikings as a valuable State amenity, the City <br />Council understands the desire to find a solution to the Vikings' stated interest in <br />developing a new stadium- and, <br />, <br />WHEREAS,, a proposal has been put forth by the Minnesota Vikings and the Ramsey <br />County Board of Commissioners to construct a new stadium in Arden Hills on the site of <br />the former Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant (TCAAP)l* and <br />I , <br />WHEREAS,, to finance the construction of this facility, the Ramsey County Board has <br />proposed the imposition of a half-cent sales tax collected in Ramsey County in an amount <br />sufficient to generate $,350 million- and, <br />WHEREAS,, at a time when our city is facing significant cuts to essential services the <br />City Council asserts that our number one policy priority is funding basic municipal <br />functions,, including police, fire, parks and public works which should be provided at a <br />reasonable cost to all taxpayers- and, <br />WHEREAS,, it is unfair and inequitable for the residents and businesses of Roseville to <br />be asked to bear a disproportionate financial burden for the construction of a State and <br />regional amenity, particularly when the benefit to Roseville taxpayers is tangential at <br />best- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.