My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0718_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0718_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:44 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 9:28:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Debra Bloom,, P.E. <br />City of Roseville <br />July 13, 2011 <br />Page 23 <br />The local and regional travel pattern shifts combined together result in a potential <br />diversion of approximately 1,900 vehicles per day under year 2011 conditions if County <br />Road C2 were connected. This results in an existing County Road C2 average daily <br />traffic volume of approximately ,510 between Hamline Avenue and Lexington Avenue. <br />o Josephine Road would have an .ITT of approximately 1,940 <br />o Woodhill Drive would have an .ITT of approximately 1,460 <br />o County Road C would have an .ITT of approximately 8,450 <br />Year 2030 traffic forecasts were developed using a combination of historical area growth, <br />the Regional Travel Demand Model and traffic volumes from the City of Roseville <br />Transportation Plan. Based on this information, an annual growth rate of one and one- <br />half percent was applied to the year 2011 peak hour volumes with and without the <br />County Road C2 connection) to develop year 2030 traffic forecasts. <br />• The local and regional travel pattern shifts combined under year 2030 conditions result in <br />a diversion of approximately 2,600 vehicles per day to County Road C2 for a total <br />projected average daily traffic volume of 3,400. <br />• Josephine Road would have an .ITT of approximately 3,200 <br />• Woodhill Drive would have an .ITT of approximately 2,000 <br />• County Road C would have an .ITT of approximately 11,600 <br />• All key intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS A during the p.m. <br />peak hour without the County Road C2 connection, and with existing traffic control and <br />geometric layout. All side-street delays are considered acceptable and do not require <br />mitigation. Under year 2011 conditions with the County Road C2 connection, all key <br />intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable overall LOS A during the p.m. <br />peak hour with existing traffic control and geometric layout. Side-street delays will <br />increase at the County Road C2 intersections with Lexington Avenue North and Hamline <br />Avenue North. However,, the increase in side-street delays is considered acceptable and <br />does not require mitigation considering year 2011 traffic volumes. <br />Under year 2030 conditions all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall <br />LOS A during the p.m. peak hour without the County Road C2 connection, and with <br />existing traffic control and geometric layout. All side-street delays are considered <br />acceptable and do not require mitigation. Under year 2030 conditions with the County <br />Road C2 connection,, all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or <br />better during the p.m. peak hour with existing traffic control and geometric layout. The <br />side-street at the Lexington Avenue North and County Road C2 intersection will operate <br />at LOS F with an eastbound side-street delay of approximately two minutes. Side-street <br />delays of this magnitude are generally considered unacceptable to motorists and warrant <br />mitigation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.