2011_0718_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

141 Me'm�be'r Wozn�iiak soui gh�t clarification that the flexible frontage as propose'd iin�cl�uide'd e'l�e'm�e'n�ts t® 142 reinforce the desire f ®r creation ®f pe'de'striian-friie'ndl r ave'nuie's and e'nviironrme'nts by offering 143, vertical scre'a'ming f ®r parkiin lots iif th�e'y were uip t® the Sl setback. Me'm�be'r Wozn�iiak opiine'd th�at, in 144 effect, th�iis al�l�owe'd flexibility buit diid not abandon the desirable attriibuite's of urban design for 145 Complete Stre'e'ts and con�n�e'ctiiviity. 146, Mr. Paschke con�cuirre'd with Me'm�be'r Wozniak; s opinion for urban frontage to be fl�e'xii biil�iity as well 147 as m�e'ch�an�iics buiiil�t iin�to iit to hide or screen parkiin g. Mr. Paschke noted that th�iis al�l�owe'd the vision 148 for Twin Lake's, while al�so al�l�owiin buiiil�diin s in some areas to move forward, buit ne'e'diin g to cormpl r 149 .1 with scre�e�n�i�n�g an�d landscaping an�d re�gu�l�ati�on�s on h�ow to m�e�e�t those re�q�u�i�re'm�e'nts iif you chose to 150 move the buiiil�diin forward. Mr. Paschke confiirm�e'd that iit al�l�owe'd for be'tte'r flexibility buit still 151 addre'sse'd ae'sth�e'tiic appeal through urban design priin�ciipl�e's. 152 Mr. Lamm nnoted, in partiicuil�ar, the atte'm�pt was to remain focuise'd on where the pri1 vate parcel and 153, the puck l�iic realm iinte'rse'cte'd, and what that actual condition m�ii gh�t be as opposed to l�e'ttiin g an r 154 solution occuir, buit to provide a uniform standard for that intersection and re'l�atiion�sh�iip to define the 155 physical edge'. 156, Mean e'r Wozn�iiak q�uie'stiione'd iif the re'cormrme'nde'd 3,6" screen was sufficient f ®r parkiin . 157 Mr. Lamm adviise'd that the recommendation was f ®r 3,6" t® 40"; and Mr. Paschke adviise'd that the 158 cuirre'nt recommendation was f ®r 3,6" rmiin�iimmuil , buit that the h�e'iighIt re'q�uiiire'rme'nt recommendation 159 couil�d be re'viise'd. 1610 Mean e'r Wozn�iiak addre'sse'd the trend f ®r vehicle h�e'iighIt de'sii gn�s that were n ®t ge'ttiin srmal�l�e'r ®n 1611 average'. 1612 Mr. Paschke q�uie'stiione'd iif the proposed minimum h�e'iighIt re'q�uiiire'rme'n�t wound screen the full ve'h�iicl�e', 1613, buit iit wound bl�ock iit t® a certain e'xte'nt, and couil�d require a rmason�ry wall in some siituiatiion�s. Mr. 1614 Paschke noted that the Plan narrative information spoke t® that possii biil�iity; h�owe've'r, he diidn�"t th�iin�k 1615 a wall was advisable e've'r ywhe're', and was unsure where th�e'y wound look good ®r be rmost 1616, applicable wiith�ouit takiin away from desirable frontage arme'niitiie's. Mr. Paschke adviise'd that 1617 diiscuissiion�s iinte'rnal�l r were still occuirriin g and be'iin g consiide're'd; whe'the'r a wall ®r vertical screen 1618 with optiion�s were best, ®r whe'the'r t® work with a deve'lope'r f ®r rmiixe'd l�an�dscapiin ®r fe'nciin g. 1619 Me'm�be'r Stroh�mr e'ile'r soui gh�t additional information ®n the process to-date f ®r puck l�iic aware'ne'ss ®f 170 the proposed Re' guil�atiin g Map and Plan, and if and how rmaiil�e'd n otike's were proviide'd be' yond 171 puck l�iish�e'd notiice'. Mean e'r StrohIm�e'ile'r adviise'd that he was rmost conce'rne'd with those residential 172 prope'rtiie's in the immediate area adjacent t® Twin Lake's; n�otirn the fragile nature and past 173, controve'rsiie's. 174 Mr. Paschke adviise'd that staff proviide'd 73,0 rmaiil�e'd notiice's f ®r the open h�ou�se', visa a le'tte'r iin�viitiin�g 175 prope'rty owners t® the open house held ®n May 25, 2011, and rme'ntiioniin ton iighIt"s Pui bl iic Hearing. 176, Howe've'r, Mr. Paschke adviise'd that duplicate notiice's Mad n ®t been sent, buit that the Pui bl�iic 177 He'ariin g Mad been notiice'd in accordance with State Statute and the standard Ciity Council Pol�iicy 178 and process f ®r land use noti�fi�catiions; and was also available t® the puck l�iic ®n the Ciity 11s we' bsiite'. 179 Mean e'r Strohmie'ile'r aske'd iif there Mad been am additional puff bl�iic outreach ®n the actual 180 Re' guil�atiin g Map and Plan sent oust at the same time as the packe�t was re'ce'iive'd by Cormrmiissii one'rs. 181 Mr. Paschke re'sponde'd ne' gatiive'l r, n�otiin that iit was n ®t typiical�l r part ®f the process; howe've'r, hie 182 noted the multitude ®f ways f ®r the puck l�iic t® contact staff and the rmass e-mail l�iist serve f ®r those 183, .1 sii gne'd uip t® receive such notiice's proviide'd. Mr. Paschke adviise'd that there Mad been n® oth�e'r 184 specific atte'rmpts ®n the part ®f staff t® send oust a copy ®f the Map and Plan cuirre'ntl r before the 185 Commission t® those 73,0 re'ciipiie'nts ®f the original le'tte'r, buit that iinte're'ste'd partiie's couil�d fend 186, multiple ways t® contact staff and re'q�uie'st a copy ®f the Plan and Map.