My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-11-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-11-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2011 9:36:57 AM
Creation date
12/22/2011 9:36:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/22/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Vanderwall recognized the rationale of Member Gjerdingen; and in <br /> balancing whether or not a street should remain open, it wouldn't hurt to leave <br /> it in the TMP if it should come up. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that, when considering whether or not to open a street, <br /> it dramatically changed the original intent of the TMP policy up to this point <br /> in addressing strategies and tools in built-out neighborhoods. Mr. Schwartz <br /> advised that this could then create significant changes to neighborhoods, using <br /> County Road C-2 as an example; and would involve a broader public policy <br /> discussion. However, with closure, Mr. Schwartz noted that a temporary <br /> measure could be initiated as a strategy, such as at County Road D and <br /> Wheeler. <br /> Member Vanderwall concurred with the original consensus to not include <br /> language about opening a street to avoid changing the intent of the TMP; and <br /> suggested that the consensus appeared to be to leave "street closure" in the <br /> TMP; but not to include "street opening" at this time unless it was later found <br /> to be needed as part of the TMP's practical application. <br /> Member Stenlund moved, Member Vanderwall seconded, recommending to <br /> the City Council the Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan as amended <br /> through tonight's discussion and including those points brought forward by <br /> Mr. Schwartz in the staff report for additional or clearer focus. <br /> Ayes: 5 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 7. Organized Trash Collection— Continued Discussion <br /> Due to time constraints, this item was deferred to a future meeting <br /> 8. Change of Date/Possible Items for Next Meeting—December 27, 2011 <br /> Chair DeBenedet polled Commissioners on their preference for a December <br /> meeting; their availability; and other scheduling commitments. <br /> By consensus, Commissioners concurred on holding a December meeting; <br /> however, it was suggested that it be moved forward one week from December 27 <br /> to December 20, 2011. <br /> To avoid a lengthy meeting, Chair DeBenedet suggested that the agenda be kept <br /> to a minimum of content, including those items identified by staff in their report <br /> dated November 22, 2011; with the majority of the meeting addressing the <br /> organized trash collection issue. <br /> Member Vanderwall moved, Member Stenlund seconded rescheduling the <br /> December regular meeting from December 27 to December 27, 2011 at 6:30 p.m. <br /> Page 15 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.