My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-11-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-11-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2011 9:36:57 AM
Creation date
12/22/2011 9:36:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/22/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Schwartz noted the four (4)items listed in the staff report dated November <br /> 22, 2011, that staff was seeking additional focus from and direction of the PWET <br /> Commission tonight. <br /> Prior to additional discussion, Chair DeBenedet opened the meeting for public <br /> comment specific to the TMP. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Megan Gardner, 1321 County Road C-2 <br /> Ms. Gardner stated that the "reckless vote of the Roseville City Council last <br /> month to open up County Road C-2" had been infuriating for her and her family; <br /> and while having a TMP for the City made perfect sense, sadly it was too late for <br /> her neighborhood. Ms. Gardner advised that she had several specific questions <br /> for the Commission. <br /> Ms. Gardner noted that tonight's PWET Commission agenda appeared to indicate <br /> that the TMP was slated for finalization; and questioned if this was their plan. <br /> Chair DeBenedet responded that it would be a goal of the Commission to do so if <br /> possible. <br /> Ms. Gardner questioned why the PWET Commission's August 2011 meeting had <br /> been cancelled. <br /> Chair DeBenedet responded that it had been cancelled due to the lack of a <br /> quorum. <br /> Ms. Gardner questioned if City Council members had available a tentative TMP <br /> when they voted on County Road C-2 five (5) weeks ago. <br /> Chair DeBenedet responded negatively, noting that the PWET Commission was <br /> still in the process of drafting the document for recommendation to the City <br /> Council; and that it was still in process with revisions and discussion among the <br /> PWET Commission and City staff <br /> Ms. Gardner questioned if, when the TMP was put on the City's website if it was <br /> an earlier draft of the draft currently being discussed. <br /> Member Vanderwall advised that various drafts of the TMP would have been part <br /> of PWET Commission agenda packet materials provided online; however, he <br /> clarified that this didn't mean individual City Council members had read those <br /> agenda materials. Member Vanderwall noted that the various agenda materials <br /> included model TMP's from other communities for PWET Commission review, <br /> upon which the Roseville-specific TMP was modeled. <br /> Page 6 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.