2011_0725_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10 7' future and residents are able to leave the building freely, this requirement would 108 become applicable at that time and the facility would have to find a way to meet this 109 requirement or cease operations. 110 d. An appropriate transition area between the use and adjacent property shall be provided b Y ree landscaping, scning, and other site improvements consistent with the 112 character of the neighborhood. Planning Division staff believes that compliance with 11 this requirement can be easily achieved with privacy fencing and other landscaping. 11 A landscaping has been provided by the applicant and, while the proposed plantings 115 should do well to screen the parking area from the neighboring property to the north 116 (and the existing shrubs should do the same for the apartment property to the west) 11 7' during the months when leaves are on the shrubs, the parking lot would not be 118 adequately screened between the late fall and spring. Planning Division staff 119 recommends requiring the installation of a 4-to-6-foot-tall opaque fence along the 120 western and northern boundaries. Perhaps a brown-colored, maintenance -free fence 121 material would be good in these locations since the existing and proposed plant 122 materials could hinder proper maintenance of wooden fence materials. 123 5.2 Although a site plan was submitted with this application, and is included with this staff 1214, report as Attachment C, the site plan is most useful for demonstrating that the vehicle 125 access to collector-level streets is being provided and for evaluating the location of the 126 trash enclosure relative to the neighboring residence to the north. All of the other 12 7' improvements shown on the site plan can and will be designed to meet the NB zoning 128 requirements, so Planning Division staff does not recommend binding an approval of the 129 CONDITIONAL USE to all of the details on the current site plan. 1'3o 5.3 Roseville's Development Review Committee, a body comprising staff from various City th I 9th 1 departments,, met on May 12 for a first look at the proposal and again on May for a 1'32 more detailed discussion. The main comments which have not been addressed above are 1 '3'3 as follows.- 1 '3 4 a. Removal of the existing parking area within the Dale Street right-of-way should be a 1'35 condition of the conditional use approval. The submitted landscape plan indicates that 1'36 this area is to be covered with sod. 1 N3 ".1 ............ 7' b. The site will be required to meet storm water quality treatment and storm sewer 1 '3 8 requirements of Roseville and Capitol Region Watershed District (CRS) and a 1'39 CRWD permit will be required. 14 0 c Issues surrounding the existing sanitary sewer easement in the northwestern comer of 14 1 the property will need to be corrected as part of the project. 14 2 d Public water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer are available at the property; drawings 14'3 for the site need to show all underground utilities and existing easements. 144 e. A diagram illustrating the movements of trash collection and/or delivery vehicles into 14 5 and through the site is necessary to verify that the turning radiuses are adequate. 14 6 f. A sidewalk consistent with Roseville's Pathway Master Plan should be constructed 14 7' along the western edge of the Dale Street right-of-way. 14 8 g Utilities abandoned after demolition of the existing structure must be removed at the 149 main. PF I I -O I R. 072 511 Page 4 of 7