Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment E <br />7'5 Mr. Lloyd advised that the items of concerned addressed by Mr. Anderson were still pending: the <br />7'6 mechanical equipment design which would determine how to address noise issues • the equipment <br />chosen and its location in the trash enclosure. Mr. Lloyd noted that the City currently had noise and <br />7'8 nuisance ordinances that would need to be met; but that staff would continue to work with the <br />7'9 applicant as the specifics • the final design elements were completed and it was determined where the <br />80 actual location would be, at which time staff would address any • e and/or on-site issues. <br />81 Mr. Anderson advised that noise was a concern for him, opining that once the unit was installed it woult' <br />82 loie 4ifficAt to tiove <br />8'3 Mr. Anderson questioned the time of day trash would be removed. <br />Lloyd advised that City Code addressed trash • ps; however, noted that some commercial <br />85 businesses needed to be serviced depending on the type of use and type of trash. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />