2011_0725_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment E 214 story apartment building were to the north and west, and then this proposed facility sweeping up to the 215 corner. Member Gisselquist noted that this size of a building was not being in-filled, but was at the edge. 216 While recognizing Member Wozniak and neighborhood concerns • the roof design, Member Gisselquist had no comment • the proposed design, but had no problem with the building's height. 218 Chair Boerigter noted that this was a Conditional Use application, and taking into consideration other 219 uses that would be permitted • that site and their potentially greater impacts for traffic, building mass 220 and height, this use seemed more amenable to the neighborhood. Chair Boerigter noted that overall, 221 the pending traffic study and City Engineer would need provide expertise in addressing traffic patterns 222 and any obvious concerns, but noted that that the City Council would consider those results. Overall, 22'3 Chair Boerigter opined that this was a good project, with minimal impact to the neighborhood compare,#' 224 • other potential uses. Chair Boerigter opined that, anytime you lived next door to a commercially- 225 z•t&• site. t1tere wouUl We so�itie 4is#aritv it loajil4ite size t1tat cQ-tA#It't We co�iirfiletelv el41 tate*l. 226 Member Wozniak opined that the gable roof was probably an attempt to tie the building into the single- 22 7' family neighborhood, but asked that the developer consider the height disparity between this building 228 and its neighbors, without the Commission recommending that as a condition for approval. 229 Member Lester noted Section 5,.1,.c and d of the staff report, questioning if there was sufficient green or 2'30 open space available. 2'31 Mr. Lloyd noted that the open area, in addition to the secured fence area did not show as significant on 2'32 the site plan; however, he noted other areas fenced in and additional landscaping • site, in addition to wuld provide green space. Mr. Lloyd further noted that a 2'3'3 the fenced areas near the secured doors, • 2'34. requirement for assisted living/nursing home facilities was to have sufficient recreational space 2'35 available, and opined that the developer's various landscaping options, including potential vacation of 2 2'36 portion • of-�way, would allow the applicant to meet City Code for available and sufficient 2 1 ............ ',3 7' open space. 2'38 Ayes: 6 2'39 Nays: 0 240 Motion carried. Page 6 of 6