My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1983_1010_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1983
>
1983_1010_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2011 12:35:55 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 12:25:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING REPORT, <br />DATE -. 5 October 1983 <br />io <br />Wt'll NUJImorER. 1,4�62-83 <br />APPLICANT ompany <br />LOCATION East of Red Lobster Restaurant, North <br />of HiLghway 36 Frontage Road <br />ACT' ION REQUESTED Special Use Permit for Site Plan <br />Approval <br />I <br />11-�LANNING ClONSIDERATIONS,., <br />I r i th i <br />la The siite in question is, a parcel w 3 5 f eet of frontage at each end and <br />a depth of 420 fielet. 'The property is zoned B-1B and has been developed for <br />rietaiLl sales use with a, building area, of 13r420 square feet. The B-lB <br />District allows retail sales structures larger than 10,000 square feet. <br />2 The appli'Licant rop,osilies to add a 2,000 square foot add't" T <br />p i- ion measuring 40 f eet <br />by 50 f eet on the front, of the structure,., The Proposed use of the addition <br />as we understand 'it J-si fioir a computer store. Attached 'is a site plan <br />Indicating the existing development, the proposed addition, and elevations <br />of the propioised structureo <br />initilially the,, plan presented was to add a concrete block building on thz- <br />front which we suggested would be inappropriate in' view of the lack of <br />conformity with tihe existing buildingg They now propose to have add the- <br />structure silo as to match the exterior materials used in the initial <br />construction . <br />4. One of the reasons for requiring site plan approval in the 13-1B Distri ct is <br />to assure some degree of compatibility between the buildings as they were <br />developed. In this case,, the structures, on either side are basically in <br />a line. Thus there may be some concern with respect to the building <br />pro3�ecling, another 40 feet. The applicant's inform us, however,, that the <br />owners of property on either side do, not ob] ect to this proposal We do <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.