My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0107_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0107_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2011 2:50:22 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 2:26:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"n A <br />Ixoseville City Council Meeting Minutes <br />Special I I I 'February 10, 2007 <br />Page 3 of 110 <br />Councilmember Pust suggested Councilmembers make every effort to reduce as <br />much paper as possible to facilitate responsible environmental conservation. <br />Councilmember Kough arrived at this time; and Mayor Klausing briefly sununa- <br />a 1i <br />riized discussion to-date and the next discussion of proposed Rule 4 from City <br />Manager Malinen's memorandum. <br />Counc�ilmembers, by consensus, agreed that receiving DRAFT agendas in elec- <br />I <br />tronic. format rather than paper would be sufficient for information and wouldw, <br />avoid confusion with the FINAL agenda in paper format. <br />Councili-nember IhIan supported using Rule 3 as, a guideline in bringing items t* <br />Work Sessilons, but would not support the provision that 'items could be placed on <br />a Council agenda at the request of at least two Councilmembers, and not by indl*- <br />vidual request, <br />0 <br />Mayor Klausing olpined that he interpreted the, provision as a response to previous <br />concerns voiced by Councilmember !h1an regarding pursuing items and balancing <br />the rights ofindividual Councilmembers while allowing the body to manage their <br />I <br />meeting" agendas, <br />Councilmember Pust Opined, that in accordance with current rules there was no vot- <br />0 <br />ing at the Work Session and even if a minority wanted to have an issue voted on if <br />new items, were considered only at a Work Session a vote was prevented on that <br />toplic with no representative option for a vote up or down. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.