Laserfiche WebLink
1 1476-83 <br />CASE NUM33ER: <br />1. <br />APPLICANT'* Dean M. W'est,erlund <br />7 December 1983 <br />Page 2 <br />would be e ight f leet. prolv I'liding for a seven foot setback rather than the <br />requ3.red, 15 <br />4 Attached is a letter from the applicant olutlining the proposals, and adding <br />the request for, a var,3".ance to the requiric-ment to construct the sidewalk <br />along Sandhurst, The appI311-cant notes, that he would be willing to construct <br />the sidewalk at such time as additional walk is constructed all aloncj <br />Sandhurst, <br />5,i Thus,, the Planning Commission and Council milay wish to consider an action <br />approving the revised-variance requiest with the condition that the develop- <br />.r <br />milent be constructed, in accordance with the site -plan submitted 10/20/83 <br />w *th the condition that sidewlk bile clnsitructed on Sandhurst Drive as <br />I ®� o I <br />required by, Ordj-nance. <br />S-Idewialk 'is required, only, along Sandhurst DrIve because the 0 <br />re -is an existin <br />pathway, construicteld on, the Lexington Avenue right-of-way., <br />