CC_Minutes_2011_1121 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,November 21,2011 Page 12 Jim DeBenedet, 808 Millwood Avenue, Roseville (GLWMO Task Force Member) Mr. DeBenedet noted that he had previously provided the Minority Report to the City Council, attached hereto and made a part hereof Mr. DeBenedet provided a history of the process for this decision initiated in early October and tonight's deadline for the member City Councils; opining that it was too short of a timeframe to allow a full review of alternatives and to have a fruitful discussion and accomplish goals in the most cost-effective manner. Mr. DeBenedet provided his rationale for the Minority Report; and his frustration at the November 4, 2011 GLWMO Special Meeting when he found out that the Task Force members were not intended to be full participants in the decision-making, with only GLWMO Board members voting on reprioritizing and re-grading criteria. At that point, Mr. DeBenedet stated that he became concerned that there was a hidden agenda at play; and while staying for the majority of the meeting as an observer while the GLWMO Board members present reviewed alternatives from a high-medium-low ranking, it was his impression that the decision had already been made. While awaiting the Majority Report and Recommendation, Mr. DeBenedet advised that he had written his letter and also contacted another Task Force member from member City Shoreview, John Moriarty, who was in agreement with Mr. DeBenedet and volunteered to alert the Shoreview City Council to the Minority Report at their meeting tonight; along with GLWMO Board member Jonathan Miller voting in opposition to the Majority Report and Recommendation. Given the management of the process and discussion of an Improved GLWMO, Mr. DeBenedet opined that in that case, there was no real or clear plan of what an Improved GLWMO constituted; and further opined that this was problematic since the cost estimates included in the revised three (3) year budget projections could not be funded with a$25.00 per resident assessment,based on the GLWMO Board's own calculations. Mr. DeBenedet noted that the GLWMO Board at- tempted to increase the fees to $32.00 per year, but opined that this was still not sustainable; in addition to the prospect of the GLWMO adding two (2) FTE's to manage the Plan and the WMO, neither of which was realistic and without defin- ing that funding source. Mr. DeBenedet opined that the only source for such funding would be through higher fees, equating an Improved GLWMO with resi- dent costs for merging with the Ramsey/Washington Area WSD. Prior to the City Council approving a revised JPA, Mr. DeBenedet strongly encouraged additional consideration of those issues. Councilmember McGehee thanked Mr. DeBenedet for providing a Minority Re- port and stating from the outset that the research time was too limited; and opined that many of these questions should have been answered before this presentation was brought forward; and that she couldn't personally see how funding for an Im- proved GLWMO could work with a flat fee per parcel.