Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 21, 2011 <br /> Page 21 <br /> Mr. Miller advised that the key decision needed by staff from the City Council <br /> was other needs that needed to be addressed between now and year-end to allo- <br /> cate any additional property tax levy put in place in September and additional <br /> monies to provide additional property tax relieve; or those items not yet budgeted, <br /> as listed on page 1 of the staff report. <br /> From a context point of view, Mayor Roe noted that the City Manager- <br /> recommended budget reviewed in advance of September provided for a 1.8% levy <br /> increase, including the additional funding requirements for the capital improve- <br /> ment program (CIP), specifically vehicles, equipment and facilities; but that it in- <br /> cluded many cuts envisioned in the original City Manager-recommended budget. <br /> With the change to market value homestead credit (MVHC) and half applied to <br /> those cuts and half applied to reducing the levy to the 1.8% since then, in addition <br /> to City Council action to approve health insurance coverage as recommended, and <br /> to not apply the $18,000 savings to the Employee Wellness Program, Mayor Roe <br /> noted that this further reduced the proposed levy increase from 1.8% to less than <br /> 1% (approximately0.95%). <br /> For context, City Manager Malinen noted that there was still a budget reduction of <br /> $475,000 programmed into the numbers referenced by Mayor Roe and before the <br /> MVHC adjustment. <br /> Related to the unfunded items listed on page 1 of the staff report, Councilmember <br /> Willmus questioned if staff had looked at the fairly detailed list of cost savings <br /> suggested by Councilmember Pust to pay for park improvements outlined in Au- <br /> gust of 2011 and whether those remained unfunded. <br /> City Manager Malinen concurred with Councilmember Willmus' statement, not- <br /> ing that the amount shown includes those items if reduces; noting that Coun- <br /> cilmembers had raised the question previously on funding levels for the Park Im- <br /> provement Program (PIP); and how much historically was included for mainte- <br /> nance versus improvements or capital; and which of those things were proposed <br /> for funding through implementation of the Parks Master Plan. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted previous suggestions of Councilmember Pust of <br /> approximately $125,000 in savings through various actions for obvious reduc- <br /> tions, such as turning the heat down in City facilities. <br /> Councilmember Pust clarified that the amount was $124,980. <br /> City Manager Malinen responded that Councilmember Pust's figures incorporated <br /> contingency amounts that had already been used. <br />