My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1121
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 12:53:55 PM
Creation date
12/27/2011 12:53:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 21, 2011 <br /> Page 9 <br /> side the GLWMO citizen boundary; the high performance of both organizations <br /> with a potential merger and their deliver to GLWMO citizens and its water re- <br /> sources; and how an Improved GLWMO could become more effective through <br /> increased focus, monitoring efforts and education through the addition of two (2) <br /> FTE's, as well as addressing citizen concerns in keeping up with needed im- <br /> provements within the GLWMO. <br /> Mr. Miller reviewed the scoring/ranking process for each option based on "high- <br /> medium-low"weighting. <br /> In conclusion, Mr. Miller advised that the majority GLWMO Board recommen- <br /> dation as to ask the respective member City Councils to approve the revised JPA <br /> and implement a specific fee for an Improved GLWMO to remain independent. <br /> Discussion among Councilmembers, Mr. Miller and Mr. Petersen included the <br /> lack of a unanimous GLWMO Board recommendation on the future of the <br /> GLWMO; the complexity of the question apparently being rushed to a request; <br /> the process to-date in the GLWMO's development of the Third Generation Plan <br /> for the next decade, and finding out late in the process of the requirements that an <br /> approved JPA be in place prior to the Plan receiving its final ninety (90)- public <br /> agency review and subsequent approval by the Board of Water and Soil Re- <br /> sources (BWSR). <br /> Additional discussion included the proposed role of an Improved GLWMO and <br /> staffing versus merger with another WSD or WMO agency in implementing the <br /> Third Generation Plan; identifying the consulting firm who drafted the Plan up- <br /> date from the previous ten (10)-year Second Generation Plan; recognizing the <br /> significant funding increase for member cities for implementation of the Plan; the <br /> strict review by BWSR of the Plan to encourage the GLWMO to address imple- <br /> mentation of the Plan to meet State mandates; and the apparently momentum from <br /> BWSR staff to consolidate the GLWMO and move toward larger WSD's rather <br /> than operating as smaller, independent WMO's. <br /> Further discussion included the validity of the Plan itself; whether water quality <br /> would be better served from a broader, more regional concept based on staffing <br /> and continuity across that broader geography; the reputation of both organizations <br /> under consideration for merging; the points brought forward in the Minority Re- <br /> port prepared and provided via e-mail by Mr. DeBenedet; funding estimates and <br /> whether they were sufficient to implement the Plan at a minimum of over the next <br /> three (3) years; and a context of the task force research in cooperation with the <br /> GLWMO Board itself and subsequent voting exclusively by the GLWMO Board. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified with City Manager Malinen that the purpose of tonight's dis- <br /> cussion was for the presentation and information gathering, with action proposed <br /> at the City Council's November 28, 2011 regular business meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.