CC_Minutes_2011_1205 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, December 05,2011 Page 17 Councilmember McGehee opined that the process to assess fines and fees was laid out, however, the state of the ordinance provided that an applicant either be told to come back at a certain date, or that consideration be given by the City Council in each individual case based their subsequent correction of the problem. Councilmember McGehee noted the specifics in each case, that of Smashburger and Marriott, and suggested options in addressing each establishment. Mayor Roe advised that the City's ordinance required training documentation be current and up-to-date at the time an application was being considered; and ques- tioned if those two (2) establishments were within compliance at this time. Lt. Rosand responded that in the Smashburger situation, that one employee on the night of the compliance check had not received adequate training; with infor- mation received from management at a later date. By ordinance requirement, Lt. Rosand noted that each establishment was required to keep its own records and upon request by the City, make it available. Lt. Rosand advised that the Police Department had asked for specific information on the one server, while Coun- cilmember Johnson had requested all training records, which had been provided to the City Council via City Manager Malinen several days after that request. Lt. Rosand advised that it appeared that Smashburger training records were now current; and that Marriott server training records were also now current. Further discussion ensued regarding training record documentation and how/when the Police Department verified training (at the time of violation by the establish- ment) and verification of training by the Department upon failure. Willmus moved, McGehee seconded, TABLING this item until the December 12, 2011 meeting in order to receive additional information from staff as indicated. Roll Call Ayes: Willmus; McGehee; and Roe. Nays: Pust. Motion carried. Councilmember Pust asked that the City Attorney also provide at that meeting any recommendations for ordinance amendment related to re-application of non- renewal periods of time. City Attorney Gaughan advised that provisions were already included in code if the City Council chose not to renew or denial and an applicable process based on the applicant's background.