|
Draft Minutes
<br />Attachment E
<br />1 a. PLANNING FILE 08-008
<br />2, Request by Michael Schueller, in conjunction with property owners Catherine and Riaz Hussain,
<br />3 for approval of an INTERIM USE PERMIT to allow a deli and catering facility at 1901 Lexington
<br />,4 Avenue
<br />5 Chiaiir Bake'm�an� ope'ne'd the Puibl�iic Hearing for Planning File 08-008.
<br />6 Mr. Lloyd re'viie'we'd the re'q�uie'st of Michael Sch�uie'l�l�e'r for an INTERIM USE PERMIT to allow a de'l�ii and
<br />7' cate'riing faciil�iity iin� the e'xiistiing buiiil�diing at 1901 Le'xiington Ave'nuu�e', iin� accordance with Roseville Ciity Code',
<br />8 Se'cti�on 1012.09 (In�te'rilmm Use's).
<br />.1
<br />9 Mr. Lloyd re'viie'we'd pre'vi�ou�s Planning Com�rmiissiion actiion for approval of a re'zon iin re'q�uie'st for the
<br />10 prope'rty; and ultimate Ciity Council denial ®t the re'zon�iin , tabl�iin the iite'rm and e'n�couiragiin the applicant
<br />11 to wiith�draw that appl�iicatiion and work with staff to devise an�oth�e�r way ®t pe'rrmiittiin the de'siire'd uise's on
<br />12, the prope'rty wiith�ouit ope'n�iin iit uip to oth�e'r traffic-intensive uise's al�l�owe'd iin a 13-113 District iin the fuituire'.
<br />13 Mr. Lloyd n�ote'd thl at the Ciity Council identified a zon iin te'xt amme'n�dmme'n�t of PUCE as de'siire'd appl�iicatiion s
<br />14 for uise's thl at th�e'y couil�d possible suipport, with staff uil�tiirmate'l r re'viie'wiin those optiion s with the Ciity
<br />15 Attorney, da'ta'rrmiiniin thl at n�e'iith�e'r wou�l�d be appropriate for the cuirre'n�t puirpose�s. Mr. Lloyd adviise'd thl at
<br />16 an IUP appl�iicatiion swa'rme'd the rmost appropriate way to te'rmporariil r allow the de'l�ii and cate'riin use on the
<br />1 7' prope'rty until a comprehensive update of the Ciity 11s Zoning Ordinance couil�d be comple'te'd.
<br />18 Staff re'commr e'nde'd APPROVAL of the re'q�uie'ste'd INTERIM USE PERMIT, for Michael Sch�uie'l�l�e'r, iin
<br />19 conju�n�ctiion with prope'rty own�e'rs Catherine and Riiaz Hu�ssaiin�, to allow a de'l�ii and cate'riin faciil�iity at 1901
<br />2,0 Le'xiin ton Ave'n�ule', base'd on the cormrme'n�ts and findings de'taine'd iin Sections 4, 5 and 6, and conditions
<br />21 ou�tl�iin�e'd iinl Se'ctiion 7 of the Project Report dated March 5, 2008.
<br />2,2, Diiscuissiion� iin�cl�uide'd the proce'ss for renewing an In�te'riim� Use Pe'rm�iit, with staff advising th�at the applicant
<br />2,3 wound ne'e'd to go through the Permitting process agaiin�; and rationale t ®r staff re'cormrme'n�diin�g a three-year
<br />24 te'rrm t ®r the Pe'rrmiit, with staff indicating that th�iis was the anticipated timeframe for uipdatiin�g the Ciity 11s
<br />2,5 zon iIn g ordiInian ce'.
<br />2,6 Applicant, Michael Schueller
<br />2`7 Mr. Sch�ule'l�l�e'r con�cuirre'd with staff's report; n�otiin�g that iit was th�e'iIr iin�te'n�t to close by 7:00 p.rm. each
<br />2,8 e�ve�n�itrig, with th� e�itr rmaiin� buisiin�e�ss duiriirig the lunch hour, iin� an effort to accommodate r��iigl� bors.
<br />2,9 Ch�aiir Baker asked Mr. Sch�uie'l�l�e'r iif he was comfortable with the proposed three year tiim�e'fram�e'.
<br />30 Mr. Sch�ule'l�l�e'r adrmiitte'd that he was sorme'wh�at uncomfortable with that tiim e'frarme', hurt e'age'r to ge't th�e'iir
<br />31 buisiin�e'ss or)e'ratiin�a. and con�fiide'n�t that re'viisiion�s wound be made to the zon�iin�a code duiriin�a that tiirme'frarme'.
<br />32, Mr. Lloyd adviise'd teat staff head re'ce'iive'd puck l�iic com�m�e'n�t from two (2) re'siide'n�ts al�on g Autumn Stre'e't,
<br />33 both iin� opposiitiion� to the project. Mr. Lloyd n�ote'd teat one was siim�pl�y opposed to the project iin� ge'ne'ral,
<br />34 while the oth�e'r party raiise'd safe'ty issues for children iin the n�e'iighborhood and iin�cre'ase'd traffiic specific to
<br />35 th�iis r)roiie'ct.
<br />36 Public Comment
<br />3 7' Patrick Schmidt, 11410 Autumn Street, FAST (Foes ©t Autumn Street Traffic)
<br />38 Mr. Sch�rmildt pre'se'n�te'd wriitte'n comr mr e'n�ts, dated March 5, 2008, re'pre'se'n�tiin FAST (Foe's of Autumn
<br />39 Stre'e't Traffic), a�tta�ched hereto and made a part thereof.
<br />,40 Carolyn Bolen, 1120 Autumn Street
<br />41 Ms. Bolen e'xpre'sse'd concem and con�fuisiion re'gardiing a piick-uip wiin�dow or drive-thru, and wan�te'd
<br />,42, cl�ariifiicatiion .
<br />,43 Ch�aiir Bakeamr an clarified the difference between the two, and assuire'd Ms. Bolen that the staff
<br />44 re'cormrme'n�datiion diid not include a drive-thru.
<br />,45 Ms. Bolen e' xpre'sse'd fuirt�e'r concem re'gardiin�g parkiimg on Autumn Stre'e't, n�otiimg that she was con ce'rn�e'd
<br />,46 teat ve'h�iicl�e's wou�l�d utilize adjoining n�e'iigh or driveways, and additional on- stre'e't parkiing wou�l�d create
<br />,4 7' fuirth�e'r safety iissuie's.
<br />,48 Staff cl�ariifiie'd that stre'e'ts, iif not de'siIgniate'd and posted "No Parking" were puibl�iic dormaiin�; hurt cl�ariifiie'd that
<br />,49 the on�l�y acce'ss for th�iis project wou�l�d be on Le'xiington Parkway.
<br />.1
<br />50 Ms. Bolen also q�uie'stiion e'd the Iocation� of proposed l�an�dscapi�ng.
<br />
|