2008_0114_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

114 much less traffic than many other permitted uses, and so would have a negligible 115 marginal impact on traffic. 116 7.4 Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities:., Planning Division staff has 117 determined that a catering facility will not have an impact on the City's public 118 infrastructure. 7.5 Compatibility .. W1 ith contiguous properties: While not specifically discussed in the 119 .1 120 application, Modifications to the existing building could include service doors for food 121 service delivery as well as the loading of catering vehicles, but none of these alterations 122 related to a catering use would change the site plan or circulation on this property beyond '123 those of a permitted restaurant. 124 7.6 Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties, The Planning 125 Division has determined that, with adequate screening,, the proposed catering facility 126 would not have any moire impact on contiguous property values than a permitted 127 restaurant that is similarly screened. 128 7.7 Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare: The Planning Division '1219 believes that the proposed catering facility will have no impact on the public health, 1310 safety, and general welfare. 131 7.8 Compatflity With the City's ComprehensiNe Plam# Because the proposed catering 132 facility is a conditionally permitted use in the B- I B Limited Retail District, it would be 133 consistent with the proposed zoning on the property and, therefore, would be compatible 134 with the Limited Business designation of Comprehensive Plan. 135 8.0 RECOMMENDATION 136 8.1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution 9414, adopted June 9, 1997 and based on the Public 137 Works Director's determination that the utilization of the existing parking areas adjacent 138 to Autumn Street would adversely affect the flow of traffic in the area, require the 139 property owner to remove these parking areas prior to reuse or redevelopment of the 140 property. 141 8.2 Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation and the comments and findings 142* detailed 'in Sections 5 and 6 of tai' report-, the Planning Division recommends approval of 143 the request for a REZONING of the subject property from B -1 to B - I B 144 843 Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation and the comments and findings 145 detailed in Sections 51 6, and 7 of this report, the Planning Division recommends 146 approval of the requested CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, subject to the following 147 conditions: 148 a. Screening consistent with that contemplated 'in § 1005.0 1G (Buffer Zones) of the 149 City Code shall be installed along the western property line to the Community '150 Development Director's approval,; 1,51 b. The applicant shall provide a landscaple plan for the property to ensure that the 152 plants and landscape features instal ' led are able to, achieve compliance with City 153 Code requirements pertaining to screening and traffic safety; 154 co This approval shall not be construed to permit a drive-through facility, which 155 requires a separate Conditional Use Permit-, 9 and PF,07-069— RCS —01 1408 Page 4 of 5