My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_1117_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_1117_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:47 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 9:25:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5) Line items in some department budgets for conferences and training were increased significantly in <br />35 2008 above actual expenditures in previous years, and the 2008 allocations have remained constant <br />36 or in some cases increased in the proposed 2009 budget. Given levy limits and economic <br />37 uncertainties, this is an area where reductions could be made, either to reduce the tax levy increase <br />3 or to reprogram to other areas where the budget is tight. Staff'Response: In 2007, the City spent <br />3 $133, 000 for training ana development for employees, Councilmembers, and Commissions. The <br />440 2008 Budget is $153, 000 or $20, 000 more than was spent in 2007. However, there were training <br />44 1� dollars that went unspent in 2007 but are expected to occur in 2008 and beyond. They include". <br />442 $3,500 citywide training for 'Respectful Beba vior'. 'Sexual Harassment'. "Diversity'. etc., $4, 000 <br />443 for tuition reimbursement, and $7, 000 for 'Career Development' training for some employees <br />4444 covered under a Collective Bargaining Aareement. <br />CII <br />445 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />,"17 <br />"18 From Councilmember Willows: <br />,4,) 2009 Budget and Levy Considerations: <br />5 <br />5 1 1) Remove allocation of $20,000 for the Leaf Pick-up Program. Ref. pg. 202 Public Works Schedule <br />52 C. Staff' Response: Removing the $20, 000 in temporary labor for this program would effectively <br />53 eliminate tie programs. The total cost oftheprograms is approximately $40, 000, which is offset by <br />541 approximately $30, 000 in participant fees. However, the program were eliminated the City <br />55 would still bave to clean the streets for drainage and environmental purposes. Totals avingsin <br />56 eliminating the program would only be about $10, 000. <br />57 <br />58 2) Reduce allocation for Parks Systems Master Planning to $60,000 and reallocate remaining Vision <br />5 2025 funds in the amount of $40,000 to Parks Systems Master Planning. Staff'Response: See <br />6(), response above to C. Iblan's question //L <br />6 11 <br />62 3) Remove allocation of $ 1 0,000 for a community survey. StaffResponse: See response above to C. <br />63 Iblan's question 114. <br />641 <br />65 4) Discuss Recycling Professional Services increase in the amount of $ 10,000 over 2008. Ref. pg. 123. <br />66 Staff'Response: Under our contract with Eureka Recycling there is a 2% annual increase in the <br />67 cost of Eureka's Recycling collection service. (Note that the other proposers proposed either a 3% <br />68 or 4% annual increase.) Annual increases are standard practice. Also note that our contract <br />prohibits the use ofluel surcharges wbicb are being assessed in other communities. Fuel is <br />7(), significantly more expensive now than when the contract was signed in 2005. The increase in the <br />7 1� cost of service will be offset by higher revenue sbaring dollars and if necessary, increased customer <br />72 fees. <br />73 <br />TI, 5) Discuss Police Administration Professional Services increase in the amount of $20,000 over 2008. <br />75 Ref. pg. 139. StaffResponse: Total Budget for 2009 is mostly comprised of 'contracted services for <br />76 the Police Records Management System, Access to the BCA records system, and Radio support <br />77 from Ramsey County. While we recognized that the support costs have increased significantly, at <br />78 this time there are NOT viable alternatives. <br />7 <br />046M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.