Laserfiche WebLink
2 1� 8 8) What is the total amount spent in 2008 on staff wages, all employer-paid healthcare costs and <br />PERA or other retirement contributions? This figure is the total 2008 staff compensation cost. Staff' <br />220 Response: The Budgeted amount for 2008 is approximately $14, 000, 000. Based on figures through <br />2 2 1� 9130108, it appears the City is on track to s end the budgeted amount. <br />p <br />222 <br />223 9) In the 2009 Recommended Budget, we are adding $155K for a 3.5% COLA, $9r <br />224 increases, $230K (or $119K - see earlier email to you and Dona) for "healthcare increases 10%, <br />225 and $65K for "PERA mandated increases. These total increases equal either $547,000 or $436,100 <br />226 (depending on whether $230K or $119,100 is the correct number for healthcare increases. Please <br />227 tell me what number is right - what is the total of 2009 compensation and benefit increases? Staff' <br />228 Response: The correct figure forthe additional amount in the tax-supported funds is $547,000. <br />2 2 �,) Citywide tb e 2009 Comp ensa tion a n d Ben efit pa ckage is approxiina tely $15, 000, 000. <br />230 <br />2 3 1� 10) What is the total percentage increase of 2009 over 2008? That is, if you compare the total 2008 <br />232 staff compensation cost to the total 2009 staff compensation costs which will include the items <br />233 listed in #2 above, what percentage increase is that. [It has to be something over 3.5%, since just <br />234 the COLA constitutes that percentage of an increase.] Staff'Response: Citywide, the increase is <br />235 approximately 7%. This increase is not unusual in municipal operations or for that matter most <br />236 service-sector industries. Because the City is in the business ofproviding services (as opposed to <br />237 making wi dge ts), p ers onn el cos ts will likely remain o ur single bigges t cos t inp u t for th e foreseea ble <br />238 future. <br />23 <br />241 The City could choose to provide a lesser compensation and benefitpackage than what has been <br />241 1� budgeted for 2009 However, this would likely create inequities between union and non-union <br />2412 employees, and would widen the wage gap of'most non-union employees who are already paid <br />2,43 below the peer average. Alternatively, the City could forgo the replacement of 'employee positions <br />2,441 as a means of'saving money. However, this would have to be coupled with reduced community <br />2415 expectations and service levels. <br />2,47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br />2418 <br />241 It is Suggested that the City Council take formal action on any recommended changes (if any) on Monda, <br />25o November 17, 2008. This is the same date that the Council will be asked to adopt the 2009 Utility Rates <br />251� and Fee Schedule. City Staff will be available at the meeting to outline any program or service impacts. <br />252 POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />253 Establishing a final deadline for Council budget submissions is consistent with the Budget Calendar <br />2 5z, adopted earlier this year. In addition, establishing a deadline for submitting budget recommendations helps <br />255 preserve the integrity of the budget process. <br />256 FINANCIAL IMPACTS <br />257 Not applicable. <br />258 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />25�,) Staff Recommends the Council adheres to the deadline noted above and take any final actions by formal <br />2 6 (), motion. <br />2 6 1 EQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br />262 If necessary, take final action by motion on the 2009 Tax Levy & Budget. <br />OEM <br />