My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_1110_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_1110_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:47 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 9:31:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1i <br />B, Materials reviewed in a closed tneeti I ng should not be distributed to the public. <br />Meeting. minutes should simply state that, a closed meeting was held and the <br />statutory gr and for closing the meeting. <br />j <br />W I I = 9 WON IN ft N I W <br />A, A ei'vil penalty not to e.*.weed $300 for each violation may be imposed upon each <br />person who Intentionally violates, the Open Meeting Law. Thi*s ipenalty cannot be <br />the County. As it is a ciVil. penalty, it is awarded to the County. <br />al <br />B. A County board member can be removed if found to have been involved. in three <br />or More actions the Open Meeting Law. See Minn.. Stat. § 13D.06, subd. 3; <br />Brown v. Cannon Falls Towns , 723 N.W.2d 31 (Minn. App. 2006). <br />addill"on, the court may award up to $13,0�00 for costs and attorneys' fees to <br />the plaintiff. This award w ould be made against the board members found, to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.