2008_0630_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4% 0 dft .8 dk Ak dk Ah a& am dill d1h dO W do do Ok db ST 4F oom�e members of the City Council ex�preissed the view that revocation for five years wias, a disproportionate penalty for the violation, and that the City Council may not have been aware at the time that 'it enacted the presumptive penalty that the state statute would prevent l�icensing for five years following revocation. In the course of the discussion, the Gity Manager recommended a 310-i to 60-day suspension. and a $1000 finJAI. 8. Aftler some, discussion, a motion was brought to 'Impose ll 30-day suspension and all $1 OlO�O fine, accompanied by a finding- that it was not clear that the Gity Council had been aware when 'it enacted the. presumptive penalty that revocation would prevent. Diavianni's from holding a lilquor license. for five years. After more 6,scussion and pubfic comment, the motion was amended to impose a 60-day suspension and a $2,000 fine. The City Council voted (4 ayes; I nay) in support of the motion.. 19. By letter dated February 13, A:ena.Ity and its right to request a hearing. -.)earing on February 211, 21,008. 2008,1 Davanni's was sent notice of the Mri Stenson fifled Davanni's request for It jib A ja M Ok $ of AT d6 A& Ift W W1 1W Sp 4P Z alll &V lit dw W W A& All 11. AIth�olugh Mr. Stenson's name and address are on the license, the suspension was sent to the restaurant at 19�05 West Perimeter Drive, Roseville, MN 551 'l and not sent to hlis address as the license holder. Mr. Stenson did not deny that Diavanni's, had received notice of the suspension, but he emph.asi'zed that he should have been personally received notice of the, suspensi.oln as the license holder. Had he received notice of the. suspension, he would have taken steps to assure that Davannt"s fully complied with its terms. 9