Laserfiche WebLink
229 <br />230 <br />231 <br />232 <br />233 <br />234 <br />6 Mixed Use Business District —Non - Conforming Uses) concludes that this Section statement <br />should be eliminated. <br />3.3 The City Planner also, after a meeting with Chair Bahaman and Director Trudgeon, revised one <br />section of the proposed amendment (page 5, Section 10 12.02) for additional clarity regarding <br />differences between residential (R.- I and R-2 zones) districts and all other zoning districts. The <br />City Planner recommends approval of the revised version. <br />3.4 The Commission voted (5-0) to recommend approval as submitted and presented to by the City <br />Planner. <br />4.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: <br />4.1 ADOPT an ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1002.02,1005.07,1012.02, 03, 04, and <br />05 of the Roseville City Code pertaining to non-conforming uses and structures. <br />4.2 BY MOTION, APPROVE THE ORDINANCE SUMMARY, describing the amendments to <br />Title 10 of the City Code, for official publication. <br />Prepared. by: Thomas Paschke, City Planner <br />Attachments: A: PC Minutes of May 7 and June 4, 2008 <br />B: Strike-out and Addition Ordinance <br />C: Summary Ordinance <br />PROJO014—RCA-071408 (2).doc Page 6 of 6 <br />