My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0721_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0721_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:49 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 11:04:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 Citywide Expenditure Comparison <br />58 The following table depicts the 2008 expenditures <br />for the fiscal period <br />ending June 30, <br />2008 for the <br />59 City's core programs and services. <br />60 <br />2008 <br />2008 <br />% <br />% <br />Bu. <br />Actual <br />Actual <br />Norm. <br />Diff. <br />Expenditures <br />General government <br />1.1759.1695 <br />776.1174 <br />44.1% <br />47.5% <br />-3.4% <br />Public safety <br />7.1514.1680 <br />3.1431.1663 <br />45.7% <br />46.7% <br />-1.0% <br />Public works <br />2.1427.1875 <br />1.1087.1533 <br />44.8% <br />46.5% <br />-1.7% <br />Information technology <br />822.1100 <br />372.1269 <br />45.3% <br />65.8% <br />-20.5% <br />Communications <br />320.1550 <br />178.1924 <br />55.8% <br />63.6% <br />-7.7% <br />Recreation <br />3.1573.1745 <br />1.1677.1545 <br />46.9% <br />42.1% <br />4.9% <br />Community development <br />1.1302.1245 <br />635.1394 <br />48.8% <br />42.8% <br />6.0% <br />License Center <br />1 .120 ,27 <br />444.1277 <br />36.9% <br />45.2% <br />-8.3% <br />Sanitary Sewer <br />3.1909.1450 <br />1.1723.1596 <br />44.1 % <br />41.1% <br />3.0% <br />Water <br />5.1173.1800 <br />1.1515.1627 <br />29.3% <br />33.3% <br />-4.0% <br />Storm Drainage <br />1.1326.1675 <br />379.1661 <br />28.6% <br />30.7% <br />-2.0% <br />Golf Course <br />410.1100 <br />202.1811 <br />49.5% <br />39.3% <br />10.2% <br />Recycling <br />384.1750 <br />237.1990 <br />61.9% <br />57.2% <br />4.6% <br />Total Expenditures $ 30.1130.1940 $ 12.1663.1463 42.0% 42.5% -,0.4% <br />6 1 <br />62 Table Comments: <br />63 Actual' colu.mn depicts the percentage spent compared to the budget <br />64 Norm' column depicts the percentage of expenditures we normally incur during this period as measured over the <br />65 previou.s 3 years <br />66 ❖ 'Diff column depicts the difference between the percentage actually spent and the percentage we typically incur. A <br />67 percentage difference of 10%, or more in this colunm would be considered significant <br />68 <br />69 Expenditure Comments <br />"7 In total,, citywide expenditures are near expected levels with a few notable exceptions. They include.- <br />"7 2 1) Information technology expenditures have been purposely withheld to help offset higher-than- <br />"7 3 expected expenditures in prior years. <br />"74 2) Communications expenditures are lower than expected, but consistent with 2005 levels. <br />"7 3) Golf Course expenditures were higher than in previous years,, primarily due to the purchase of new <br />"7 6 grounds maintenance equipment which occurs every few years. <br />77 <br />"7 N, Einal Comments <br />"7 9 The City's overall financial condition remains strong. During the 2nd quarter, the City typically relies <br />partially on cash reserves to pay for on-going expenditures in between property tax collection periods. At <br />this time,, there does not appear to be any financial concerns. However, continued monitoring will be made <br />82 throughout the year. <br />3 <br />Page 3 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.