My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_1013_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_1013_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:48 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 11:52:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.1 <br />FuIrth�e�r dilsculssilon nn�cl�uIde'd Twib Lake's �1 aste'r pl�anI as an e'xamlpl�e'; Cre'atn®n ®t a n�e�w zonInnI g district (B- <br />6) specifically de'sil gnle'd for thl at are'a 1s re'de've'l�opmme'n�t (il.e'., stre'e'ts anId a transportation pl�anI with <br />re'l�iie've'rs off CouIn�ty Road C an�d diiscuIssiion� with Mn�DOT ib re'l�atiion sh�iip to 1-3,5W, an�d Ciity con�strulctiion� <br />of Terrace Road with a m�e'diian as part of a future Twib Lakes Parkway); an�d th�e'iir eventual <br />ii m�pl�e'mme'n�tatiion . <br />Additional dnsculssn®n nn�cl�uIde'd timing for de'te'rmmnnInnI g how t® address e'xnstnnI g anId future m�aste'r plans; <br />th�e�nr impact t® de�ve�l�opmme�n�t ib specific areas, whether t® de�l�ay addre�ssilnl g mmaste�r plans as part ®t the <br />Comprehensive Plan Update anId provide them as amme'n�dmme'n�ts at a l�ate'r date if ilt ils de'te'rmmnn�e'd that <br />th�e'y sh�ouIl�d be nn�cl�ulde'd ®r re'fe're'n�ce'd ib the P1�an1; purpose ®t �1 aste'r plans as a guide anId th�e�ilr legal <br />affects; suIpe'r majority vote for amme'n�dmme'n�t t® the Comprehensive Plan anId implications for �1 aste'r plans <br />anId th�e�ilr suIbse'q�ule'n�t value ib on�l r re'q�ulilrilnl g a simple majority vote if n ®t incorporated ilnito the <br />Comprehensive Plan, and re'm�aiin�iin stead alone guIiide's; an�d re'cogn�iitiion� thl at the Comprehensive Plan <br />doges not include zone itn ordinances, bult provilde's an ove'rvile'w, with zone itn ordinances provilditn conk trol�s <br />or al�l�owiin for iim�pl�e'mme'n�tatiion of the broader pol�iiciie's ou�tl�iin�e'd ib the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Dinsculssion e'n�suIe'd re' gardilnl g ilnite'nIt anId cant ®t language ®n page 11-5, suI bd. 1; whe'the'r the language <br />sh�ouIl�d define �1 aste'r plans as a "guInde'" rath�e'r th�an a "tool;" anId whe'the'r there was con�se'n�suIs am�on�g <br />Planning Commissioners thl at incorporating mmaste'r plans iin�to the Comprehensive Plan was a good iide'a, <br />when ilts purpose was t® provide "ideals," ®r nonbinding ideas. <br />Commissioner Boe'rigte'r opnn�e'd that the Lilt Council sh�ouIl�d have a dear timetable ®n what the Lilt y 11s <br />ilnite'nIt ils for each anId e've'ry e'xilstilnl g m�aste'r p1�an1, t® provide darity for n�e�i�gh�bors, cntnze'n�s anId the <br />Me'tropol�ntan Council as to what the mmaste'r plans mme'an�t. Commissioner Boe�rn gte'r e'n�coulrage'd <br />Commissioners to be dear, and if e'xnstnn mmaste'r plans were nn�te'n�de'd to be nonbinding, wnth�ou�t fulrth�e'r <br />action of the Cnty Couln�cnl�, th�e'n there sh�oull�d be n�o q�ule'stion th1 at, based on a 4/5 vote', the Cnty Council <br />has de'cide'd thl at e've'ry existing mmaste'r plan its n�oth�iIn more than a nonbinding guide for de've'l�opmme'n�t. <br />Commissioner Gottfried opiln�e'd thl at the Com�m�nssnon n�e'e'de'd to determine the value of mmaste'r plans, an�d <br />to make thl at value an�d th�e'iir iin�te'n�t very dear ib the Comprehensive Plan, one way or an�oth�e'r. <br />.1 <br />Commissio oh <br />ner D�e'rty opiin�e'd th at, while not sayi�n mmaste'r plans diidn�"t have val�ule', th�e'y sh�ouIl�d be <br />iide'n�tiifiie'd as nonbinding wiith�ou�t specific actiion of the Ciity Council by simple majority vote'. <br />Ch1 aiir Bakes 'roman opiin�e'd thl at the mmaste'r plans mmulst be ib concert with the Comprehensive Plan, an�d an�y <br />pus'se's that don "t agree wou�l�d ne'e'd to chun�ge�, e'iith�e'r ib the Comprehensive Plan or a mmaste'r plan. <br />By consensus, Commissioners approved adding a statement to recommended additional <br />language on page 3, ©t the staff report, Secti ©n 11. entitled, "Using the Plan,"' for master plans <br />adopted pri ©r to 2009, as follows: <br />""These master plans are not addressed as part of the Comprehensive Plan without further action <br />by the City Council." <br />FuIrth�e'r dnsculssion' iln�cl�uIde'd avoiding the Comprehensive Plan be'com�ien' a work plan's, an' d to include <br />nmmple'mme'nttatn®n strate'gie's thl at the Cnty Council will use to determine a review process for �1 aste'r plans; <br />an' d re'com i e'n�datn on�s ®t Cnty Attorney Sq�uIire's ib h�ins commmme'n�ts nn�cl�uIde'd ib the staff report. <br />MOTION <br />Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Gottfried to add additional language to <br />Implementati ©n Strategies, page 11-3, entitled, ','Using the Plan,"' as follows: <br />""The it Council will establish a plan to address the issue of master plans <br />adopted prior to 2009; a�nd these pre-2009 master plans are not addressed as part of the <br />Comprehensive Plan without further action of the it Council. " <br />Provide clarification of relationships between master plans a�nd the <br />Comprehensive Plan in the "official controls" section of the Comprehensive Plaq, indicating that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.