My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_1013_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_1013_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:48 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 11:52:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To.- Roseville Planning Commission <br />Roseville City Council <br />Re.- Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee — Minority Report <br />Classification of Target and Har-,Mar Sites as Regional Business <br />These two areas,, which the draft comprehensive plan for many months had listed as guided into the <br />future for "Community Business" should remain guided for "Community Business" and not guided <br />for "Regional Business."' Regional Business provides goods and services to a regional market area, <br />i.e. it seeks to attract customers from outside the community to drive into the community, acquire <br />goods and services, and then leave the community. This designation includes regional-scale malls, <br />shopping centers, freestanding large-format stores,, among other uses, with no specific limit on scale <br />or size. The Target and Har-Mar areas are more appropriately guided for Community Business, with <br />a scale limit of 100,,000 sq. ft./individual building or perhaps another method of limiting scale). <br />The draft comprehensive plan allocates substantial areas to "Regional Business"' designation,, areas <br />including the Rosedale area, and other areas adjacent to Highways 35 and 36. Snelling Avenue <br />approaches its capacity today. Rosedale-like traffic at Snelling and County Road B is not a wise plan <br />for the future. The neighborhoods north, south,, east and west of these two areas merit protection <br />from development of Regional Business in the heart of Roseville. "Community Business"' <br />designation presents many opportunities for eventual redevelopment without sacrificing the livability <br />of the neighborhoods. Residents of those neighborhoods should not expect to have as quiet <br />environment, perhaps, as areas that are not immediately adjacent to commercial development. <br />However,, they should not expect to have their neighborhoods swallowed by "Regional Business"' <br />when there are adequate areas in other parts of Roseville for large-scale businesses that are designed <br />to attract customers from all around the region. <br />Freestanding large-format stores do not provide living wage jobs for families. The development of <br />transit and transitways depends upon the development of ridership — and ridership is linked first and <br />foremost to employment. In order to be transit-ready, Roseville should guide its future toward <br />employment. <br />There is nothing wrong with limiting the deployment of such stores in our community. Other <br />communities have done so in their comprehensive plans, excluding additional development of <br />something of which the community already has adequate supply. Roseville already has more retail <br />capacity per capita than any other city in the State of Minnesota. The draft comprehensive plan <br />identifies other areas,, beyond Target and Har-Mar sites,, that are appropriately guided for "Regional <br />Business."' "Regional Business"' does not get short shrift in Roseville today or in the draft <br />comprehensive plan identifying Target and Har-Mar sites as "Community Business."' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.