My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0825_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0825_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:50 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 1:35:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(the distance between the proposed structure and the wetland can be as close as 33 feet 'in, <br />the closest sectioln)8, the Pro ect will greatly accelerate the eutrophication process leading <br />i <br />to hypo and destruction of the aquatic ecosystem. <br />The proposed building, road and parking lot will replace what is currently a rain- <br />Permeable soil. by impervious surface. According to the proposed plan (Appendix A) <br />F <br />around 60 -- 70% of the forestland is estimated to be converted into impervious surface. <br />Such change will substantially increase soil and nutrients run-offs, limits ground water <br />recharge, and degrade the quality of nearby water body including the wetland directly <br />borders South of the structure. <br />The Project plan does include storm water holding ponds. But given the size of the <br />. i <br />proposed structure, paved road and park it lot t i,s unclear fron-i the plans how those <br />ponds would effectively hold storm water., Any storm water holding pond, should meet <br />4, <br />the capacity requi.rement to hold the run-off from the proposed, building as well as road <br />and parking lot., <br />,C. Visual Impacts <br />The planning staff report by Thomas Paschke seems to suggest that sloped roofs reduce <br />visual impact. 10 A simple trigonometry will easily show that the more the roof is sloped, <br />the higher it should be designed, which, aggravate the visual impact. The idea that no <br />matter how big the structure is there will be no visual impact as long as the roof is <br />slopped is nonsense. Indeed the height of the attic is equi - valent to approximately 1.5 <br />story adding substantial height to the proposed structure. <br />Adding the above ground parking lot, 4 story residential units and the 1.5 story <br />equivallent attic,, the overall structure as currently planned is more adequately described as <br />a 6.5 story- equivalent building, while the proposal consistently note it as a, four story co- <br />op., Especially when such a structure is placed. next to single-family homes, the visual <br />contrast will be rather dramatic. <br />"'See attached plan in Appendix A. <br />9A full-size soccer field for adults and professionals measures 60X1 yards, which is about 54,000 sqf. The cross- <br />sectional area lo the proposed structure is about 60X620 feet rectaniglie., which, measures 37,200 sqf, which is <br />approxii-nately 701% of the area of a soccer field, <br />10 Request for Council Action, clause 12. La http://�.�l Ny Ny. c it-vo 1-rose v i Ile. corn/DOC LIM(., ntV i ew. asp'.) DI D= 1697 visited <br />July 17, 2,0108. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.