Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment F <br />ROSEVILLEi PA-RKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />MlNiUTES OF MEETING OF MARC.H 612007 <br />ROSEVIILLE CITY HALL — 7:OOPM <br />PRESENT: Bro�dt Lenz. Jacobson Johnson Karnrath. Mu el. Pederson, Ristow, Stark <br />SENT: Willmus (called to notify staff of absie, roc <br />e) <br />STAFF: Brokke. A-nfang.. Schultz, Boettcher, N,4axe_ Cash.. Evenson <br />GLTESTS: Alex Hall,, United Properties <br />1. fNTRODUCTIONiSIROLL CALLIPURLIC CO-�VVfENT <br />No Pubilic Comment <br />2,. APPROVAL OF YIIN-UTES — MARCH 6, 2007 MF.ETING <br />Ciominissio'n. Recommendaion: Minutes of the March 61. 2007 mecting were tinammou:sty approved., <br />3. UNITED PROPERTIE�S SEMOR. HOUSING PROPOSAL NEAR LANGTON LAKE PARK <br />Staff' ii-itroduced this topic and indicated that this agenda item was for information purposes only and a <br />recommendation was not expected tonight. The staffs brief review included that;. <br />V United Properties is pro�posing a senior housing development. on approximately 6 acres of land at <br />3 ) 0 10 Cleveland A- venue on the West side of Langton fake Park near the soccer field. <br />I -nn -o preliminary site plans were from <br />a There were plans included ire coi ussionpacket.Tv I <br />United Properties and the third plan is the adopted Langton Lake Park Master Plan. <br />■ industrial Current access to the existing park parking lot is through the industr I waxehouse park*nc lot on the <br />south of the proposed development and existing park land. <br />12, <br />Staff also indicated that park related concerns included, but are certainly not limited to.. <br />The extreme. sensitivity off any park land exchange! <br />Meeting the goals of the adopted park master, plan. and ensuring future public access to the park. <br />I - <br />T <br />'The 1�mportance of consIderation of the existing aidopted park inaster plan <br />Trail comiections to the park` <br />Mr. Hall of United Proper-ties presented the details of their two proposals and relayed information fron-i recent <br />neighborh,00d meetings; velopment is contained within the <br />2 First proposal doles, not change access to the park and the de. <br />property lines of current ownership (this plan is, preferred by United Properties). <br />N Second proposal involves, a parldand exchange and includes a new road to access the existing park <br />parking lot, (will, discuss, farther if City is interested). <br />al A neighborhood mecting was field by United Properties for those that live on Brenner Avenue just <br />bordering, the site and N,14r.. Hall stated that neighbor comments included the dislike for access to the <br />dievelolpinient and park- off Brenner. Ave and concerns ab(Alt the impact a four story building might <br />have on. the homes and yards to the north of the development. <br />+ 4 <br />Con-imission asked, a numbex of questions related to the priesented proposals. 'rhe p6mary discussions centered <br />on o wnership and who -would be responsible for mauitenanicle of the road as well as the importance of <br />consideration of`' the adopted an ton Lake /f aster Plan. <br />Commissioner Willmus was not able to be at the meet'ing, but shared his thoughts in wri tin o. Chair Johnson <br />shared read those thoughts. Commissioner Willnius comments indicated that plan 41 and 42 do not conform to <br />the adopted Langton Lake Park Master Plan and fail to, satisfy the requirements of the Roseville <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Con,im I ission Recommendation: -Noforn-ial recommendation. Discussion centered on the importance of the <br />. <br />adherence to the adopted Langton Lake Park 'Master Plan. <br />ONTER <br />