My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0922_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0922_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2011 11:38:49 AM
Creation date
12/29/2011 11:03:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Background <br />I <br />History of Roseville's Pathways <br />Trail development in Roseville started during the early 1970's with a small loop in Sandcastle Park <br />which led to the construction of the very popular Central Park system, the 1995 construction of the <br />County Road C pathway and the 1997 expansion of the Acorn Park trails. In 1975 a comprehensive <br />plan for trails was developed similar to the network that is being proposed with this document. The <br />desire was to have an integrated system of paths that connected residents to area parks. The intent <br />was mainly recreational. <br />The City's first pathway plan created a surge of development in the 1970's locating pathways mainly <br />in the parks. City code was changed later to dictate that developers were responsible for providing <br />pedestrian accommodations to their new facility, so sidewalks started to sprout up in commercial and <br />industrial areas. Outside funding sources became more available in the 198,0's, which also increased <br />the development of pathways including a growing interest in basic pathway facilities for bike <br />commuters. <br />As a follow-up to Vista 2000, on September 11, 1995 the City Council appointed a volunteer <br />advisory committee to work with staff to develop a comprehensive pathway master plan. The <br />advisory committee was made up of fourteen Roseville residents and three staff members. We have <br />included information regarding this process in the Appendix. This plan was approved by City <br />Council in 1997 and updated in 2003. The main focus of the 2003 update was to re-prioritize the list <br />of pathway project that were identified within the 1997 plan, eliminating the ones that had been <br />constructed and creating new priorities. <br />Current Conditions <br />Demographics <br />2000 US Census Data indicates that Roseville has a stable population; this is mainly due to limited <br />developable land. Some additional census information: <br />• Roseville's population increased I% since 1990; from 33,48,5 in 1990 to 33,690 in 2000. <br />• Roseville lost 1,250 residents under the age of 45 from 1990 to 2000. <br />• Roseville has a large population of older residents. 20% of the 2000 population was age 65 or <br />older. This compares with 12% for Ramsey County and 10% for the Twin Cities region. <br />• The overall age of Roseville is notably older than the county and the region. The 2000 <br />median age of Roseville's population was 41.0 years. This compares with 33.7 years for the <br />County and 34.2 years for the region. <br />• The aging resident stability indicates that Roseville is a desirable place to live and most are <br />staying in the community. <br />City of Roseville Pathway Master Plan <br />Final Review Draft August 2008 , Page 8, of 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.