My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0922_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0922_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2011 11:38:49 AM
Creation date
12/29/2011 11:03:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
138 <br />improvements can be financed without public assistance. The association has <br />139 <br />completed a capital improvement reserve plan and Staff has reviewed the plan. The <br />14O <br />reserve funding plan for future capital improvement/replacement projects uses Cash <br />141 <br />Flow projections with the goal of maintaining a positive balance in the reserve fund <br />142 <br />account for the next 30 years. The initial monthly reserve contribution requirement <br />143 <br />is $,13(x.19 per unit per month. This is the minimum amount needed to meet the <br />144 <br />projected expenditures and fulfill the mandate of the state statute 515B.3-114 and the <br />145 <br />association's governing documents. This amount is $84.1 per unit per month above <br />146 <br />the association's 2008/09 budgeted rate. This report and additional increased <br />147 <br />amount to the Townhome owner's was presented on August 12, 2008. The new <br />148 <br />increase will take effect in April 2009, the beginning of the Associations fiscal year. <br />149 <br />In addition the association will also be required to provide the City with annual <br />150 <br />financial reports until the public financing has been repaid. (Attachment E). <br />151 3.6 At its last board meeting on August 12, 2008, the Westwood Village I home owner's <br />152 where presented with what the monthly costs could be with the City Assisting with <br />153 Financing of the improvements through the use of a Housing Improvement Area. <br />154 Based upon a loan amount of $,1.5 million the payments would range between $,250- <br />155 $,3 11 a month based upon interest rate and term of loan that the City of Roseville is <br />156 willing to grant to the association. The City of Roseville when assessing <br />157 improvements has in the past only granted a 15 year term and has charged <br />158 administration fee of 1.5% onto the interest charged to the City. Staff is <br />159 recommending that the City Council stays with the past practices. However <br />160 Westwood Village I association has requested that the City consider a 20 year term <br />161 and reducing its administration fee to less than 1.5%. Currently if the City was to <br />162 bond for these improvements and did a direct placement with Bremer bank the <br />163 current interest rate is 6.09% to the City for 7 years with a 15 year term and <br />164 amortization. See below for alternative finance options. <br />Financing <br />Bank <br />HIA <br />HIA <br />HIA <br />HIA <br />Term <br />7 <br />15 <br />15 <br />20 <br />20 <br />Interest <br />6.09 <br />7% <br />8% <br />7% <br />8% <br />Monthly Payment <br />$379.94 <br />$,292.01 <br />$,310.72 <br />$,251.05 <br />$,270.88 <br />Annual Payment <br />$4559.2? <br />$3,504.08 <br />$3,728.60 <br />$3,012.54 <br />$3,250.60 <br />165 <br />166 3.7 At the August 12, 2008 board meeting information regarding costs of construction <br />167 and projected association due increases were discussed as well as assessment fees <br />168 that the association could have set against the property. At that time Westwood <br />169 Village I did take a vote regarding moving forward with the improvements. Out <br />170 of 47 home owner's 41 were in attendance (6 were via proxy), and the vote was 35 <br />171 in favor,, 4 against, and 2 abstained. <br />172 3.8 If a housing improvement area is established, a second public hearing will be held <br />173 in the future to discuss the cost of the project and the amounts to be assessed <br />174 against each unit. A resolution assessing those costs would have to be adopted <br />Council Meeting (09-'22-'08) - Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.