Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment E <br />521 Mr. Bl�oom adviise'd th�at Mr. Wiickl�u n�d wou�l�d u�l�tiim�ate'l�y n�ot prole be irn� the picture twe'n�ty (20) years from n�ow, <br />522 kilt th�at the Ciity wou�l�d re�miaiin responsible for iits iin�frastru�ctulre', with all drainage ponds be'iin part of that pulbl�iic <br />2 "3 in�frastru ctu re'. Ms. Bl�oo� advised th�at the Cilty cu�rre�n�tl r man�age'd oveil" one h�u�n�dre'd an�d twe'n�ty (120) basins; an�d <br />524 re'viI e'we'd the Cilty"s proce'ss il1 identifying, inventorying th�e' m e've'ry five (5) 'e'ars, ratiln�g, an�d maintaining each of <br />525 those ponds. Ms. Bl�oomn advised th�at part of th�at maintenance was removing se'dilmee'n�t at iln�l�e'ts and ou�tl�e'ts, <br />526 base'd on a varile'ty of re'gu�l�ation�s. Ms. Bl�oomn advised th�at th�ils process was a re'q�ulire�m�e'n�t of the Minnesota <br />527 Pol�l�u�tilon Control Age'n1 cy (MPCA) an�d th�e�i�r pe�rm�i�ttilni g for the CiIty to operate a separate storm� wate'r syste'm�. Ms. <br />528 Bl�oom� advilse'd that the Cilty prioritized maintenance base'd otl"li vari 1ou, s iIssu�es, iln cl . diln th�e�ilr capacity, se�dilm� e'n" t <br />529 de'l�tas, an�d the fre'q�ule'n�cy of th�at re'q�ulire'd maintenance base'd on varilouls data amid an�al�ysils of se'dilmee'n�t. <br />5'30 Me'n�mbe'r Gottfried q�u�e�stion�e'd if those capital costs were picke'd uIp by those pu�rch�asin the prope'rty. <br />5'31 Ms. Bl�oomn advilse'd th�at e've'ry q�ularte'rl�y u till�ilty lily's fee was stru�ctu�re�d to tumid th�at maintenance for the Cilty s <br />5'32 sanitary, water an�d storms water in�frastru�ctu�re's, an expense th�at was sh�are'd across the board by all re'side'nts. <br />5'3'3 Ms. Bl�oo� e'stinmmate'd that e've'ry single-family h�om�e'own�e'r paid approximately $20 pe'r ye'ar as a flat rate'; an�d that <br />S1314 commercial/industrial prope�rti�e's pa II base' d on the size of th�e'iIr siIte'. <br />5'35 Ms. Bl�o mn advised that there were some e'xce'ption�s where re'side'nts se'rve'd by a n1 e�wl r-con�stru�cte'd storms water <br />5'36 pon�d con�triibu�te'd to iits maintenance rath�e'r th�an� the whole com�m�u n�iity (e'. g. Appl�e'wood Point) when a <br />5 1 ............ <br />'N'3 7' public /private partners iIp was n�e�gotilate with the Cilty providin e'avy mail�n' teen' an' ce+ , an' the private de've�l�ope+ r <br />5'38 providing ae'sth�e'tiic am�e'n�iitiie's above an�d be'yon�d the basiic an�d average pond maintenance an�d de'pre'ciiatiion�. M <br />5'39 addre'ssiInl ruIn off from cilty stre'e'ts, Ms. Bl�oomn n�ote'd th�at the stre'e'ts were pu bl�iIc, an�d n�ot re'strilcte'd to the private <br />540 de've'l�opmee�n�t, an�d th�at e've'ry drop of water drain�e'd ilnl to the pond an�d se'rve'd a pu bl�iIc purpose'. Ms. Bl�oomn n�ote'd <br />541 that, when h�om�e'own�e'rs took on th�at maintenance th�e'n{mse'l�ve's, the Ciity de've'l�ope'd partnerships in addressing <br />542 m�aiin�te'n�an�ce'. Ms. Bl�oomn n�ote'd th�at there were some private hydrants th�at were n�ot cu�rre'n�tl r be'iin e'xe'rciise'd, <br />4 "3 an�d th�at the Cilty Council an�d Pu�bl�i1c Works Department n�e'e'de'd to make decisions to ensure l�on -te'rm ope'ration�s <br />54 and d safe'ty of ilts re'side'nts. <br />545 MOTION <br />546 Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Best t© RECOMMEND approval ©t the proposed <br />547 PRELIMINARY PLAT ©t the property in the northwest corner ©t Lexingt ©n Avenue and County Road C2; <br />548 based on the comments and findings ©t Sections 41-6 and the conditions ©t Secti ©n 7 ©t the Request t ©r <br />549 Planning Commission Acti ©n dated March 2, 2011. <br />550 Me'm{ e'r Wozn�iiak opiin�e'd that thins was a good proposal, an�d spoke irn su pport of pathway con�n�e'ctiion�s. Me'm{ e'r <br />551 Wozn�iiak fulrt�e'r opiin�e'd that there appe'are'd to be n�o re'ason� to make the proposal con�tiin�ge'n�t uIpon� ope�n�iin�g <br />552 Cou�n�ty Road C2; an�d th�at he was n�ot con�vi�n�ce'd th�at the projected additional traffic from the de've'l�opm�e�n�t <br />"3 re'q�uli�re'd such a m�e'asu�re'. Me'mbe'r Wozn�ilak expre'sse'd appre'ciati on that the de've'l�opm�e�n�t was de'signe'd to take <br />554 an�y potential op till of Cou1nity Road C2 iInito conlsiI de'ratiIoni. Me'm�be'r WozniiIak opiInie' d thiat if additional <br />555 de've'l�opm� e�n�t on the cast side of Le'xiin ton Avenue occu�rre'd of Me'diiu�m� De�n�siity Residential (MDR) or h�iigh� e'r, <br />556 fulrth�e�r con�side'rati on into ope'n�in Cou�n�ty Road C2 m� ay be n�e'e'de'd; iln1 additi on to additional traffiIc calms i�nlg <br />55 7' m�i�ti�gati�on� fol�l�owi�n�g the con�ce�rn�s e�xpre�sse�d during pu�bl�i�c com�m�e'n�t ton�il gh�t. Me'm�be'r Wozn�iIak spoke ilni sulpport of <br />558 the proposed de've'l�opm�e�n�t. <br />559 Me'm�be'r Gisse1quist expre'sse'd appre'ciiatiion� for the confidence diispl�aye�d irn� the Roseville com�m�uln�iity her. Pulte <br />560 Hom�e's. Me' m�be'r Gisse1quist opiin�e'd that he diidnl "t anticipate residential de've'l�opm� e�n�t irn the coon muu�n�iity at thins <br />561 tii m�e', but was ple'ase'd to see iit. Me'mbe'r Gisse1quist expre'sse'd Ails appre'ciiatiion of the nl e�w tree pre'se'rvatiion� <br />562 ordinance an�d the de've'l�ope'r 11 s compliance with iit. Me'mbe'r Gisse1quist n�ote'd that he head come iinl to ton�iighit"s <br />56'3 m�e'e'tin with the impression that ilt m� ay be ne'ce'ssary to look at ope'n�in Cou�n�ty Road C2; h�owe've'r, while h�e�arin�g <br />5&4 good argue me'n�ts on both side's, ilt appe'are'd that the issue glad been sufficiently de'bate'd iln1 the past, an�d he saw <br />565 nl o n�e�w evidence that ope'n�in ilt wou�l�d alleviate traffiIc flows or the de've'l�opm�e�n�t, an�d m� ay iln1 fact create more <br />566 probl�e�n{ms. Me'm{ e'r Gisse1quist opiin�e'd that lack of a signal on Lc'xiinl ton Avenue an�d Couln�ty Road C2 m� ay create <br />56 7' an�oth�e'r probl�e'm{ ,kilt coin l�d be addre'sse'd irn the future if so e'viide'n�ce'd. Me'mbe'r Gisse1quist opiin�e'd that iit was <br />568 good that the Ciity re'taiin�e'd the right-of-way an�d diid n�ot pre'viioulsl r vacate iit. Me'mbe'r Gisse1quist opiin�e'd that th�iis <br />569 was a sou�n�d proposal an�d spoke irn support of iit. <br />570 Me' m�be'r Wozn�iiak opiin�e'd that h�iis on�l concem with the proposal was ilts storm� wate'r m�an�age'm�e'n�t p an�, bgilt he <br />571 u n�de'rstood that iit was the responsibility of the Ciity 11s Pu�bl�iic Works Department staff an�d the RCWD. Me'm{ e'r <br />572 Wozn�iiak opi�n�e�d th�at he was n�ot con�vi�n�ce�d th�at cu�rre�n�t m�ode�l�i�n�g was adequate to addre'ss culrre'n�t climate <br />conditions; an�d e'n1 cou�rage'd the RCWD to coot isi�de'r additional miiIt III atiIon� mie'asu1re's above an�d be'yon�d cu1rre'n�t <br />5TH mode'l�s to manage storm water II <br />nl thiiIs de've' opm�e'nit, e'xpre'ssiIni g hiiIs preference thiat the storm� wate'r p anis niotfaiI . <br />Page 11 of 12 <br />