My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0808_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0808_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:51 PM
Creation date
12/29/2011 12:02:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Debra Bloom,, P.E. July 13, 2011 <br />City of Roseville Page 15 <br />Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS)�, which indicates how well an <br />intersection is operating. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle. Intersections <br />are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and <br />LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. In the Twin Cities metropolitan <br />area,, LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable by drivers. For side-street stop <br />controlled intersections,, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of <br />service of the minor approach. Traffic operations at unsignalized intersections with side-street <br />stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall <br />intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the <br />intersection and the capability of the intersection to support those volumes. Second, it is <br />important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop,, <br />the majority of delay is attributed to the side-street approaches in most cases. Table 2 presents <br />the level of service criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. <br />T'abl�e 2, <br />Legal of Service Criteria for Sii gnal�iized and Unsi'gnalized Intersections <br />Level of Service <br />Average Delay per Vehicle [seconds] <br />Signalized Intersections <br />Unsignalized Intersections <br />A <br />< 10 <br />< 10 <br />B <br />10-20 <br />10-15 <br />C <br />20-35 <br />15-25 <br />D <br />35-55 <br />25-35 <br />E <br />55-80 <br />35-50 <br />F <br />> 80 <br />> 50 <br />(1) Stop-controlled intersection LOS criteria are the swine for side-street and all-way stop controlled intersections. <br />Results of the year 2011 operations analysis shown in Table 3 indicate that all key intersections <br />currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS A during the p.m. peak hour with existing traffic <br />control and geometric layout. All side-street delays are considered acceptable and do not require <br />mitigation. With year 2011 traffic volume levels and the County Road C2 connection, all key <br />intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable overall LOS A during the p.m. peak hour <br />with existing traffic control and geometric layout. Side-street delays will increase at the County <br />Road C2 intersections with Lexington Avenue North and Hamline Avenue North. However, the <br />increase in side-street delays is considered acceptable and does not require mitigation. <br />Therefore,, from an operations perspective, the potential County Road C2 connection does not <br />significantly impact area intersection operations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.