My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0808_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0808_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:51 PM
Creation date
12/29/2011 12:02:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26. According to page 23 of the stud�y., all key intersections currently operate at an <br />acceptable LOS (level of service) d g peak hour without the County Road C2 <br />connection, both now in 2011 and at 2030 projected traffic volumes, with the exception <br />of 2030 LOS d�egrad�ation to "F"' at Lexington and C2. What is the reason to open C2 if <br />d�oing so will not only have no positive impact on overall traffic levels of service at key <br />intersections., but will actually cause future d�eteriorating LOS where none exists now? <br />RESPONSE: The scope of the study was to identify the impacts associated with a <br />potential connection of County Road C2. No specific recommendation regarding <br />connecting this roadway is included in this study. <br />27. According to reports from the Roseville Police Department for the period 2005 to <br />present., there were 13 motor vehicle incid�ents involving property d�amage and personal <br />injury at H�amline and C2 compared to 4 incid�ents over the same period at H�amline and <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.