My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0414_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0414_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:52 PM
Creation date
12/29/2011 3:00:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rls�kspvlffi� <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Department Approval <br />x ,nt4 <br />Item Description: Approve Amendments to the 2007 Budget <br />Date: 4/14/08 <br />Item No.: 7.e <br />City Manager Approval <br />BACKGROUND <br />The City annually adopts budgets on the basis set forth by State Statute, and generally accepted accounting <br />principles. Although the City adopts a single all - encompassing budget, additional measures are necessary <br />to show that all expenditures within the General Fund and certain Special Purpose Funds are within budget <br />appropriations, when presented in the annual financial statements. <br />The legal level of budgetary control (i.e. the level at which expenditures may not legally exceed <br />appropriations) has been established at the fund level, as opposed to line -item or individual programs. It is <br />recognized that the City's Department Heads, under the approval of the City Manager, may make transfers <br />of appropriations within the department. However, if the expenditures exceed the total fund budget, a <br />budget amendment must be shown. <br />It's worth noting, that these types of year -end adjustments are typical for local governments like Roseville <br />given the size and scope of operations. Rather than make numerous budget adjustments throughout the <br />year and incur the significant administrative costs of monitoring the budget on a daily basis, it is customary <br />to reflect the changes in one all - encompassing adjustment. The year -end budget adjustments typically <br />reflect reallocated or additional costs that are offset by unbudgeted grants, fees, or other revenues. <br />The following budget amendment to the 2007 General Fund budget is submitted for consideration: <br />1) $ 350, 000 in Public Safety expenditures which included; $ 2 50, 000 in purchases of federally - funded <br />SCBA's for the Fire Department, $45,000 in Police overtime (offset by personnel vacancies) and <br />$05,000 in Police department purchases paid for out of donations and/or forfeiture funds. <br />2) $150,000 in Public works expenditures which included; $50,000 in additional motor fuel and street <br />maintenance materials, and $100,000 in engineering consulting services provided to the Cities of <br />Arden Hills and Falcon Heights. Consulting services costs were offset by added fees. <br />The following budget amendment to the 2007 Recreation Fund budget is submitted for consideration: <br />1) $35,000 for additional salaries expense. while the 2007 Budget included a cost of living <br />adjustment and expected pay plan step increases, the Fund realized higher - than - expected healthcare <br />premium costs and merit pay plan increases. <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.