My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0609_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0609_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:53 PM
Creation date
12/29/2011 3:25:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Approval <br />t InA <br />Rls�&Spvl� <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 06/09/05 <br />Item No.: 12.d <br />City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Resolution Approving the Arena Refrigeration System Funding Plan <br />BACKGROUND <br />By previous action, the City Council has directed Staff to continue moving forward With the replacement of <br />the Arena refrigeration system. The Council is now asked to formally approve a funding plan by <br />resolution. <br />The estimated cost of the project is between $1.5 and $2.4 million. The Building Replacement Fund has a <br />current balance of $300,000 which is currently earmarked for this project. As a result, the City will have to <br />secure approximately $1.2 to $2.1 million dollars above and beyond what is available in the Building <br />Replacement Fund. <br />In previous discussions Staff identified a number of potential funding sources for the proj ect, including the <br />use of a temporary loan from the City's Street Infrastructure Replacement Fund which is used to maintain <br />and replace City streets. However, given the size of the loan required to fund the project and recognizing <br />that the City would have limited ability to repay the loan in any reasonable timeframe, Staff recommends <br />that the City borrow money through the issuance of equipment certificates. Equipment certificates work <br />much the same as a City bond. The certificates would be repaid over a 10-year period and can be issued <br />without voter approval. Staff s Recommendation is based on the following: <br />1) State - imposed levy limits that are in place for the 2009 -2011 fiscal years would effectively prohibit <br />the City from increasing the tax levy to repay the loan in a reasonable amount of time. <br />2) Transferring monies away from the Infrastructure Fund for an extended period will result in a <br />substantial decline in the City's street pavement condition rating. <br />3) Drawing further on existing City reserves, would violate the Council- approved Operating Budget <br />Reserve Policy, and could potentially jeopardize the City's bond rating. <br />4) Issuing debt for capital improvements is allowed under State Statute and is consistent with the <br />City's Debt Policy. <br />5) Issuing approximately $2 million in debt to extend the life of an existing capital asset will not <br />jeopardize the City's bond rating. The City's debt per capita is $322. The median level for cities <br />the size of Roseville is $750. <br />6} Under State Statute, the City has the capacity to have up to $55 million in outstanding debt. <br />Currently we have only $5 million which is approximately the same amount of debt we had when <br />we issued $10 Million in bonds to finance the City Hall and Public Works building expansion in <br />2003. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.