My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0616_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0616_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2011 9:16:21 AM
Creation date
12/30/2011 9:04:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Budget Impacts — Major Cost Items <br />The following major cost items are expected to impact the City's 2009 Budget: <br />❖ Based on recent contract settlements with peer cities, the City is forecasting a 3.5% cost -of- living <br />adjustment for City employees. In addition, most City employees are eligible to receive pay -step <br />increases under the City's Compensation Plan which will also increase City costs. The total <br />financial impact on the 2009 Budget is estimated to be approximately $030,000. <br />❖ Based on current healthcare and utilization trends, the City is forecasting a 30% increase in <br />healthcare premiums. Under current practice, the City's share of those premiums would be one -half <br />or 15% with the employee bearing the other half. The total financial impact on the 2009 Budget is <br />estimated to be approximately $250,000. <br />❖ Motor fuel costs are expected to increase by approximately $55,000 citywide or 40 %. <br />❖ Energy - related costs (gas and electric) are expected to increase by $70,000 or 10 %. <br />••• Under legislation approved in prior years, the City's share of PERA will increase in 2009 from <br />0.50% to 0.75% of employee salaries for non - police and fire personnel and from 12.9% to 14.1 % <br />for police and fire personnel. The total financial impact on the 2009 Budget will be approximately <br />$75,000. <br />The major cost items detailed above amount to $1,110,000 of which approximately $550,000 is accounted <br />for in property -tax supported programs. This does not include the impacts on other operating costs due to <br />general inflation such as supplies and materials, contracted services, insurance, etc. Nor does it include any <br />additional monies for the City's capital replacement programs. <br />Property Tax Impact <br />If the City determined to put forth a budget that simply maintains the status quo, it is estimated that the <br />property tax levy would need to increase by $500,000 or 0 %. Absent an increase of this size, the City <br />would either need to identify new non - property tax revenues (such as a street light or transportation utility) , <br />spend reserves, or reduce service levels. <br />Because of stagnant housing values (see above) , approximately 70% of the added tax burden would fall on <br />commercial /retail property owners. <br />POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />A discussion on the Council's goals and priorities is identfied on the 2009 Budget Calendar as outlined in <br />Resolution #10588, dated January 7, 2005. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACTS <br />Not applicable <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Council formally identify which goals and priorities should receive funding <br />priority for 2009. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.