res_8242 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF ROSEVILLE RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall of Monday, the eleventh day of January, 1988, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Mayor Rog Matson, Cushman, Kehr, and Johnson, and the following were absent: None. and Councilmembers CouncilmemberMatson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 8242 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ON IMPROVEMENT NO. ST-87-15 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on December 21, 1988, the City Public Works Director has prepared plans and specifications for Improvement No. ST-87-15 and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota: 1. Such plans and specifications, copies of which are attached hereto, and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Manager shall prepare the cause to be inserted in the Roseville Review, the official newspaper, and in the Construction Bulletin, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement for Improvement No. ST-87-15 shall be published as required by law, shall specify the work to be done, shall call the bids on the basis of cash payment for such work, shall state that the bids will be received by the City Manager and Public Works Director until 11:00 a.m. on January 29, 1988, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Hall by the city Manager and subsequently be considered by the Council; and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Manager and accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check or bid bond payable to the Manager for ten percent of the amount of such bid. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by CouncilmemberCushman and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Matson, Cushman, Kehr, Johnson, and Rag , . and the followlng voted against: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.