My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0418_Packet_amended
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0418_Packet_amended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 2:40:37 PM
Creation date
1/6/2012 2:34:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
qASPAL+E <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 4/18/2011 <br />ITEM NO: 9.a <br />De'artment Approval: City Manager Approval: <br />Item Description: Request by the Roseville Planning Division for approval of a text <br />amendment to Chapter 1009 of the Zoning Code to add regulations <br />pertaining to accessory dwelling units (PxoJ -0017) <br />1 1.0 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS <br />2 1.1 The substantial updates to Roseville's Zoning Code, which were the focus of much of the <br />3 Planning Commission's efforts in 2010, were approved by the City Council on December <br />4 13, 2010 and became effective when the ordinance summary was published in the <br />5 Roseville- Little Canada Review on December 21, 2010. Among the new zoning <br />6 provisions was the process for considering Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) as <br />7 conditional uses. An ADU is variously known as a "mother -in -law apartment" or "granny <br />8 flat" and is generally used as additional living area for the property owner or as a small, <br />9 efficiency -sized dwelling unit that may be occupied by a family member or other <br />10 unrelated renter. <br />11 1.2 The conditional use requirements that apply to ADUs mostly address the form of such a <br />12 unit, ensuring that the single - family character of a property is maintained and restricting <br />13 the size of a unit as a way of practically limiting the number of occupants to one or two, <br />14 but Planning Division staff did not account for the potential for larger existing spaces to <br />15 be used. During the review of the first proposed ADU in February, however, it became <br />16 clear that existing spaces which exceed the maximum size limit may be considered for <br />17 conditional use approval, conceivably providing occupancy for several people. For this <br />18 reason, Planning Division staff is proposing a zoning TEXT AMENDMENT to add a <br />19 restriction in the number of occupants. <br />20 1.3 Also, as the Development Review Committee reviewed that first ADU proposal, the <br />21 Police and Fire Department representatives expressed an interest in ensuring that an ADU <br />22 have a unique address so that it can be quickly identified by emergency responders if <br />23 necessary. To this end, Planning Division staff is proposing to add a requirement that a <br />24 unique address identifier (e.g., 3091 Fairview Avenue Unit B) be permanently assigned <br />25 to each ADU; a unique address would be assigned to an ADU during the process of <br />26 issuing a building permit, but it would not serve a practical purpose when an ADU is <br />27 vacant or is used by the property owner as part of the overall living area of the home. <br />28 1.4 The proposed amendments are shown in bold and „ „a�, text in the draft <br />29 ordinance included with this staff report as Attachment A; note that to track the proposed <br />30 changes in this way, the amendments have been prepared using Microsoft Word and so <br />31 will not have the same formatting as any final adopted amendments to the Zoning Code <br />32 as developed with Adobe InDesign. <br />Amdt2_RCA_041811 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.