My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0518_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0518_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:47:18 PM
Creation date
1/6/2012 2:54:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
65 f. Compatility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />66 6.2 Impact on traffic: Because Pawn America proposes to expand into an adjacent tenant <br />67 space in an existing shopping center, Planning Division has determined that the use <br />68 would have no more impact on traffic than other permitted uses that could occupy the <br />69 same space. <br />7o 6.3 Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities: The proposal represents a retail <br />71 use in an existing retail space, and so would not have additional impacts on parks, streets, <br />72 and other public facilities. <br />73 6.4 Compatibility ... with contiguous properties: No changes are proposed to the site plan, <br />74 internal traffic circulation, or landscaping, and the proposed internal structural <br />75 modifications would not affect the site's compatibility with contiguous properties. <br />76 6.5 Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties: People tend to have <br />77 negative feelings about pawn stores and their perceived effect on residential property <br />78 values, but when a property is assigned Zoning and Comprehensive Plan land use <br />79 designations, careful consideration is given to protecting the value of surrounding <br />80 properties. In light of this, and because a pawn store is among the uses that are allowed <br />81 (conditionally or otherwise) in the B -3 District and is consistent with the "business" <br />82 designation of the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Division has determined that the <br />83 expanded pawn store use will not affect the market value of contiguous properties. <br />84 6.6 Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare: Police Department staff has <br />85 indicated that pawn shops are no more likely to have illegal activity or police calls than a <br />86 general retail business and that Roseville police enjoy a very cooperative relationship <br />87 with the existing Pawn America store; the Planning Division therefore believes that the <br />88 proposed expansion of the existing store will have no discernable impact on the general <br />89 public health, safety, and welfare. City licensing requirements for pawn shops are also <br />90 geared toward protecting the health, safety, and welfare of Roseville's residents, and if <br />91 Pawn America fails to satisfy those requirements, the company risks revocation of its <br />92 license. Even if Pawn America operates in compliance with its license but the use is later <br />93 determined to have a negative impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare, <br />94 the CONDITIONAL USE approval can be invalidated. <br />95 6.7 Compatility with the City's Comprehensive Plan: A pawn store is a conditionally <br />96 permitted use in the B -3 General Business District and is compatible with the <br />97 Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Business. <br />98 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />99 7.1 On May 6, 2009, the Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public <br />100 hearing regarding the Pawn America request. At the hearing no citizens were present <br />101 to address the Commission, however that applicant was present to answer questions <br />102 and provide additional clarification regarding the request. <br />103 7.2 The Commission was unclear (as was the Planning Staff) on the condition for <br />104 surveillance of the parking lot and whether or to what extent the existing cameras <br />105 would suffice. They requested staff clarify prior to Council approval. <br />106 7.3 The Commission was also concerned with the site adding a drive -thru window <br />107 without amending the approval Conditional Use so that included this as a condition. <br />PF09 -011 RCA 051809.doc <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.