My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0518_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0518_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:47:18 PM
Creation date
1/6/2012 2:54:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The reduction in staff would. not i. of itself eliminate the accounts receivable, purchase orders, <br />and receptionist duties. The City wo td have to change its accounting and purchasing policies to <br />no longer require purchase orders and to no longer- track whether billed accounts were actually <br />paid on an on-going basis. Instead, salaried individuals would have to absorb these functions as <br />part of their year-end closing duties. This would weaken the City's internal controls, and delay <br />the collection of unpaid accounts which would subsequently result in less interest earnings. <br />In addition, the City could no longer house an individual at the reception desk full -time. This <br />would necessitate a change in how the City receives in- -hound phone calls and may require <br />individuals to walk down to the finance area to receive a receipt.. It may also require greater <br />directional signage in the main lobby area. finally, it could have an impact on. those departments <br />that have service counters near the lobby as customers seek assistance in finding various <br />locations within the building or seek answers to general. inquiries. <br />Final Comments <br />While the budget reductions described above are relatively small, the cuts could jeopardize the <br />Department's ability to generate revenues not only to support the Finance Department, but other <br />departments as well. <br />In addition, the City needs to be mindful of the cumulative effects of staffing reductions and <br />reduced slillsets. The Finance Division. has steadily reduced its workforce and downgraded its <br />professional requirements since the late 1980's. At its staffing highpoint, the Division had 1 <br />`T 's, whereas today we have 7. In 2002 the Finance Division had 8 employees, 7 of which <br />were professional level, 4 --year degree required positions. Today, the Division has 7 employees, <br />only 3 of which are at a professional level. Personnel changes since 2002 include: <br />• #.* Eliminated a full. -time Accountant position <br />*:* Downgraded the Accounting Supervisor position to are. Accountant position <br />Downgraded a professional-level. position (Payroll) to a technician level <br />Downgraded a professional -level position (Accounts Payable) to a. technician level <br />Downgraded a professional -level position Utifity Billing) to a t echnician level <br />These staffing changes are unprecedented com are to other City Departments. Arid. while <br />they've produced significant on -going savings, it has left the 11vi.sion with diminished sl lllsets <br />and capabilities. <br />In the past decade, the Finance/Accounting Division has eliminated or reduced a number of tasks <br />and responsibilities to accommodate these staffing changes. Some of those tads include <br />.educed internal audits of City purchases and payroll timekeeping <br />Reduced emphasis on managing the City's investment portfolio <br />*% Elimination of monthly financial reporting to City Departments <br />o:* Elimination of non-payment utility billing reminders <br />Elimination of on-site audits of lawful gambling operations <br />Elimination of quarterly financial reports related to the City's lawful gambling <br />operations <br />Absent staffing increases it is unlikely that these tasks could be reinstituted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.