Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Steve North <br />Assistant City Manage <br />City of Roseville <br />Page 2 <br />April 16, 1981 <br />ordinance applies to those signs but, given the long peri r od of time they <br />liave been in existence, I believe it w1*11 be extremely difficult enforce the <br />irdinance as to those signs, <br />Signs erected prior to the 1974 recodifi cation, - which were legal at the time <br />of erection, but which became nonconforming by reason of the 1974 <br />recodification, would be aJlowed to continue indefini'tely, or until such time <br />as the use is intensified. The 30 month period to remove nonconforming <br />signs, quoted above, does not apply to the 1974 recodificationO <br />If the Council chooses such an approach, it could either allow the nonconforminT <br />signs erected prior to the date in 1981 indefinitely or until they are removed or <br />intensified, or, in the alternative, could allow them but require that they be <br />removed by a certain date, Proposed ordinance language for those alternative <br />z-pproaches follows: <br />"Any nonconforming use of land involving a sign erected <br />rprior may be continued." 0 <br />or, in the alternative, <br />lb <br />"Any nonconforming use of land involving a sign erected <br />before 9 1981, may be continued f or a <br />period of months, by which time It must be <br />removed," <br />