My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1981_0511_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1981
>
1981_0511_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 8:54:49 AM
Creation date
1/9/2012 8:52:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PETERSON. BELL & CONvr=RSE <br />1800 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING <br />701 EAST FIFTH STREET <br />ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 <br />224-4703 (612) <br />Mr. Steve North <br />Assistant City Manager <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55111 <br />*r47_WTj916,41 I . <br />M <br />Fke: Non-Conforming Signs <br />Our File No. Ml-599 <br />At your request I have prepared the enclosed amendment to the City's sign <br />,ilrdinance. <br />The new Sections 14-035 through 14.037, cover the phaseout of non-conforming <br />zdvert1sing signs. I felt 'it best to make a statement of policy 'in Section 14,035, <br />so that if this ordinance is ever reviewed by a court, the City Council's rationalca <br />for the ordinance will be clear, <br />F have also amended the definitions of business signs and nonbusiness signs tit <br />zZlear up an ambiguity in the previous language. It is now clear that both signs <br />Rdvertising the name of the business and a commodity sold, must be located on <br />the premises. In the previous language, it could be argued that the limitation t4 <br />the premises only applied to the commodity. <br />FAinally, the new Section 14,180, grandfathers all non-conforming signs in placz- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.