Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
I HFAT&WO] " N <br />[7-�ETERSON. BELL &CONVERS1 <br />IaOO AMERICAN NATIONAL 13ANK BUILDING <br />101 EAST FIFTK STREET <br />ST. PAUL.. MINNESOTA 55101 <br />224-4703 (612) 1 <br />Mr. Steve North <br />Assistant City Manager <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55111 <br />le: Non-Conforming Stgnr-s <br />Our File No. M 1.599 <br />At your request I have prepared the enclosed amendment to the City's sign <br />vird" <br />inance. <br />The new Sections 14,035 through 14,037, cover the phaseout of non-conforming <br />advertising signs. I felt it best to make a statement of policy in S ' ection 14.035, <br />so that if this ordinance is ever reviewed by a court, the City Council's rationale <br />for the ordinance will be clear, <br />r have also amended the defin't' <br />i j ions of business signs and nonbusiness signs to <br />clear up an ambiguity in the previous language. It is now dear that both signs <br />zdvertising the name of the business and a commodity sold, must be located on <br />the premises. In the previous language, it coLdd be argued that the limitation ts. <br />the premises only applied to the commodity, <br />Finally, the new Section 14.180, grandfathers all non-conforming signs in plac-�.: <br />