Laserfiche WebLink
1304 -81 <br />City of Roseville <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Proposed ordinance Regarding the Use <br />of Newspaper 'Tubes <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />1 Attached is a copy of our last month's report outlining many of the <br />considerations related to this subject. Also attached are copies of three <br />letters received from citizens supgor ting the position that "newspaper <br />tubes" should not be allowed in the front of our residences. Attached <br />too for your reference is a copy of an article in the Roseville Sun ( 20 May <br />1981) relating to the question. We have not attached copies of previous <br />letters from the newspapers or the opinion from our attorney that were <br />published with last month's report. Please refer to that report for this <br />information. <br />2. Since the last eeting of the Planning Commission,. we have received no <br />additional information, nor had further contact with representatives of <br />the newspapers. At the last meeting, and in a conference at City Mall <br />previous to that, we have attempted to gain a better understanding o f the <br />problem by exploring the economic issues involved relating to newspaper <br />delivery by various methods. We believe we can .conclude that we have been <br />relatively unsuccessful in gaining any knowledge in depth regarding this <br />aspect of the problem. We are agar e , however, that the systems utilized by <br />the Minneapolis gaper and others are significantly different from that <br />systcm utilized by the Saint Paul pager . As you will recall , the Saint <br />Paul paper representatives indicated that they contract with carriers at a <br />set rate and that these carriers are then free to "charge whatever the <br />traffic will bear" for the furnishing of the paper and its delivery. It <br />appears that these prices vary widely, and that they are substantially <br />higher for delivery by vehicle and placement in a newspaper tube. our <br />suggestion that we learn more about the economics of delivery was by way <br />of gaining a greater understanding of the problem. The principal issue, <br />however, in our opinion, is that of control of land use within our objective <br />of maintaining and contining to ]wild a desirable comurunity. . <br />3, We have learned since the last meeting that the City of North oaks has <br />adopted an ordinance regarding newspaper tube placement. We are being sent <br />A copy of this Ordinance from the City of North oaks and dope to have it for <br />your review prior' to the Planning commission meeting of 3 June. In essence, <br />we are informed that the Ordinance required the plat emtent of the newspaper <br />tube within 18 inches of the f ederal post of f ice system' s - required mailbox. <br />All mail delivery in the City of North Oaks is by way of mural mall box <br />system, and is therefore significantly different from the situation in <br />large areas of Roseville. <br />