My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1981_0713_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1981
>
1981_0713_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 9:13:14 AM
Creation date
1/9/2012 9:07:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W �A, A"A LeYd -a <br />PIETIERSON. BIELL & CONVERSE <br />1600 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING <br />101 EASY FIFTH STREET <br />ST. PAIL. M111AESOTA 55101 <br />224-4703 (612) <br />M r, Steve North <br />Assistant City Manager <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55111 <br />I - - <br />rN'e: Non-Conforming Sign:r <br />Our File No,, M 1-599 <br />At your request I have prepared the enclosed amendment to the City's sigr <br />ordinance. <br />The new Sections 14.035 through 14.037, cover the phaseout of non-conf orming <br />zdvertising signs., I f elt it best to make a statement of policy in Section 14.035, <br />so that if this ordinance is ever reviewed by a court, the City Council's rationale <br />for the ordinance will be clear, <br />I have also amended the definitions of business signs and nonbusiness Signs to <br />clear up an ambiguity in the previous language. It is now clear that both signs <br />advertising the name of the business and a commodity sold, must be located on <br />the premises. In the previous language, it could be argued that the limitation to <br />the premises only applied to the commodity,. <br />V <br />Finally, the new Section 14.180, grandfathers all non-conformi 0 ng signs in place- <br />opp• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.