My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1981_0810_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1981
>
1981_0810_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 9:37:48 AM
Creation date
1/9/2012 9:35:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 August 1981 <br />CASE NUMBERO .0 <br />1327-81 <br />APPLICANT: Glenn Kloskin <br />LOCATION: Northwest Corner Of County Road C and <br />Western Avenue <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Rezoning from R-1 to R,2 <br />s Pi E%35 a Wk 0 <br />1. The property in question is contiguous to the townhouse development north <br />of County Road C. The property is located at the intersection of County <br />Road C and Western with a frontage of 100 feet on Western and a depth of <br />135 feet on County Road C,, <br />2. The applicant proposes to construct a duplex on the property and therefore <br />requests rezoning from R-1 to R-2. The size of the site is in conformance <br />with the minimum requirements for a corner lot for a duplex occupancy,, <br />Attached is a copy of a letter from the applicant to the City indicating <br />his reasons for the rezoning. Also attached is a copy of a petition signed <br />by a number of number of property owners in the area indicating their <br />approval of the proposal. The location map attached indicates the <br />property in question, with the lot shaded in black. The cross-hatched <br />lines indicate the properties where the owners have indicated their <br />approval, <br />3. It has been the policy of the City in the past to consider the development <br />of duplex lots in isolated locations throughout the City where there <br />appear to be sufficient reason for the development of such lots for <br />duple - Xes rather than single family housing. The lot in question, of <br />i <br />course, s somewhat less desirable for single family purposes inasmuch as <br />it is located at the intersection of two major thoroughfares in the city. <br />4. The applicants has submitted a site plan indicating the proposed location <br />of the duplex unit on the site conforming to Ordinance setback requirements, <br />A copy of that drawing is attached. <br />Perhaps of equal importance to the location, is that of the design of the <br />unit itself. The applicant has not submitted the design to the City as <br />of this point in time. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to <br />question the applicant regarding the proposed unit inasmuch as the design <br />could have considerable impact on its effect on contiguous properties and <br />its general acceptability on this site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.